This makes sense, i see the issue here. Im assuming if a mod closes a report for more info though, if the original poster creates a follow up then the orginal mod reassumes ownership of the follow up? Or does it go back into the pool for any mod to take ownership.
Hey @Smin1080p_WT a little quick question. What is the source yall are using to state that the F-102 could use the Aim-4F and G? Because everything else im seeing about the plane makes no mention of being compatible and list only the earlier versions of the missile
1 Like
I have one hope for this update before it goes live: a fix for the F-86E(M). As it should be a Mk 4, and the Mk 4 never used the Orenda engine. As both Italy and Greece got their Canadair Sabres with the same program (the CL-13 Mk 4 in the Italian tree should also be named F-86E(M) due to that…)
Bug report for that: Community Bug Reporting System
2 Likes
What does “(M)” mean? Aeronautica Militare usually calls theirs just F-86E.
https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/en/2023/05/30/f-86-e-k/
- And i didnt compare them.
- Germany has only one A7 unlike sweden, and while a very good tank its not AS strong as some people here try to depict it.
- i agree that the A5/A5 POS and A6 should share the same BR
- hell will freeze over bevore we get actual decompression
- the A7/122 should be higher but a whole BR is a bit much (13.3 A7 and 12.3 std. Leos) 0.7 would be best imo
If you have the same players perform the same or better in a supposedly over-Brd tank and a adequate tank at the same BR, then thats probably beacuse the tanks are comparable. The LeClers are not as bad as some people make them out to be.
All im saying is that the std. Leos A5/A6/POS and LeClercs are similar, different playstyle but comparable effectiveness.
@Smin1080p_WT , the blog is blatantly incorrect on its assertions that the F-102 could use Aim-4F/G, here is someone detailing why
3 Likes
The Leclercs ARE mid 12.7s at best, objectively.
Only because French mains manage to make them work it doesn’t mean they are great.
What’s great about them?
Their 50mm thick LFP? (which funnily enough should be 35mm lmao)
Their 250mm KE UFP? (which should be 570, like the main glacis, and bounce off way more)
Their cheeks that are only able to stop low-end fire?
Their 85mm thick mantlet that’s 1/3rd of the turret surface?
Their 575mm pen at point blank?
Their “fuel tanks exploded” floor tanks?
Their acceleration that’s worse than a Leopard’s despite being 6 tons lighter?
Their basket filled with FCS and electronic modules?
12.0 M1A1 AIM and Leopard 2A4M are better.
2 Likes
What we got this time
Has Exocet been added yet?
Is SM2 afterburner blue? (v2)
while i wanna say nice a single Exocet isnt gonna do anything in game especially in the max rank, even with 4 Sea Eagles you are lucky to get one through
Exocet with terminal maneuvers to dodge missiles
Huge
Which plane has reveiced it?
It’s super annoying gaijin hasn’t added that for the ASMs in game
Nice, the question now is did they also add the air to surface mode on the rafale to actually make it usable or is it facing the same situation as Viggen.
Am I crazy or is it basically using the stats from RBS-15F MK.1
WIP I know but a bit unfortunate
all Rafales