The american tech tree none the early afterburner engine strategic bomber from USAF & US Navy
The UK tech tree none SAAF 1st gen British HAWK, Mirage III, Mirage F1, de Havilland Vampire and Licensed-built MB-326
2 Likes
They would have to make up the majority of the flight characteristics for the AIM-424, so I doubt that one would be added anytime soon (if ever)
@Zulizia it’s your fault that everytime i play 10.7 and i see the new released indonesian light tank my mind cannot think of anything otherwise from Harimeow!!
i will send you a fax with my negative words and medical expenses for the damage provoked.
–uncordially and displeasedly: Me
“thy part in this should not be forgiven”
6 Likes
sounds like a skissue, personally :)
3 Likes
Spoiler
3 Likes
He so cute 😍
1 Like
I’m gonna lose my mind, if they don’t post the announcement for the next event vehicle tomorrow
It’s probably not going to be worth the wait, but man, I’m suffering from event withdrawal
1 Like
AGM-88G has probably much more guesswork than AIM-424, as it likely uses Mk104 dual thrust motor, which aint new
They gave AGM-88G a dual pulse motor, and ive never ever saw any specific info about that motor
424 as i said above probably uses mk104 motor, which is dual thrust
I get that they did this for the AGM-88G and that you could just guess-timate what motor the missile uses, but at what point do we stop and consider a missile unfit for implementation then?
When next to nothing is known about it. It pains me to say it but for now AIM-260 is in this category. Even with AIM-424 we have general dimensions that the fin dimensions can be estimated from with pictures, the weight, and a public range figure for it to reach ingame
“Next to nothing” doesn’t really rule anything out…
The T.1As didn’t have them and didn’t have the capacity to use them. The wiring is not there in the wings (confirmed by the manual) to use the extra pylons and in the cockpit, the weapon selector only has the two pylon switches. One port and one starboard.
Unfortunately its a case of a couple of non-standard modifications of the Hawk were modified to show off the extra pylons that were offered to export customers in the 50 and 60 series Hawks, but the RAF Hawk T.1As did not have the capacity of them. Hence why they have not been added. The maximum take-off weight of the T.1A also has further confirmatory information to show that some of the export weaponry simply wouldn’t be possible with the restrictions on T.1A and its load capacity. Without modifications to the wings to allow it.
9 Likes
The F-16C Block 50 has been really good in my experience (the PoBIT is probably good as well but I haven’t actually stock grinded it yet). I am consistently getting to the top of my team by a pretty wide margin.
Honestly the AIM-424 has the same amount of flight information that the initial fox-3 additions had for developers to add them, so it’s not too bad. The same can’t be said for AIM-260 though.
Well, there’s this semi-credible source stating that the AARGM-ER has dual-pulse motor, but I don’t know if this organization is taking part in production of the AARGM-ER. But if they produce even subcomponents for the AARGM-ER then they would be credible. To me it would be weird for a manufacturing company to publish news on the missile if they’re not associated with it.
Poland Secures $745 Million Deal for 200 US-made AARGM-ER Missiles | Amphenol Aerospace
The AGM-88G AARGM-ER is an advanced iteration of the AGM-88 missile series, featuring a dual-pulse solid rocket motor and an advanced warhead, effectively doubling its range over previous versions.
It seems like they may be involved:
1 Like
Okay this part does confirm AARGM-ER is one of their products. So yeah, there’s confirmation that AARGM-ER has dual pulse, more than you can say about AIM-260 @Frieren14
1 Like
very fair