does this mean its not to late for more cheiftains
If we had something new to announce in that regard, this would be done in a news item.
Naturally not, we added a new one just a year ago: [Development] Chieftain 900: Royal Ordnance’s Chieftain - News - War Thunder
Does this mean Danish F-35 or TF-35 is still on the table then?
1 Like
As Khorne said, SM2 doesn’t have MAWS. But it’s funny to think about the Super Hornet being the only plane without MAWS at 15.0, 15.3, and 15.7 especially when it gets next-gen missiles like AIM-424, AIM-260, and AIM-174B.
Wonder if we will ever see more plans to expand the number of vertical tec free lines 😢
I don’t see how this has any relation to the Hawk comment. Any vehicle that we haven’t denied is technically possible at some stage. It doesn’t mean its in any current plans.
They won’t do that
Yeah… have been denied by Smin for like the last 2-3 patches. Maybe someday
1 Like
Well we got 2 Drakens in less than 2 years which is arguably the max we get if we are lucky
Can you confirm or deny whether we will get a SAAF operated plane next update?
Surely we will get another one of those someday
The T-2 was added in March 2019. 7.5 years ago.
1 Like
We are not going to confirm or deny anything at the current moment in time, before we have had the CM update or a single dev blog for the next major.
Otherwise its 20 more pings after yours of “can you confirm or deny X, Y and Z”
1 Like
But… can you confirm or deny x, y and z?
4 Likes
well they did make a LDIRCM pod for it which of course has a MAWS
As the primary top tier supersonic jet fighter for Japan. A very strange comparison to the Hawk there im afraid. Its closest RAF counterpart would be:
Added just a year later.
1 Like
Such a grathical question that
so more challengers it is then :D 3 years since the last tech tree one was added and it was a bad excuse of a challenger “3”
The question sure as heck left Smin speechless
1 Like