Tiny planes are cool.
Especially tiny props.
The Eastchurch Kitten would be peak.
Packing a whopping 35hp engine and was somehow rated for a max alt of 14k ft.
2 Likes
This thing getting added now is like the Shackleton getting added 6 years after the age of bombers to warthunder.
Powercrept to hell and back but still nice to see
1 Like
Gasp : O
4 Likes
Runaway
@Smin1080p_WT Is there any plans for developers to rework thrust-vectoring mechanic? I know it’s not a new problem and has been around even back to the days of the SRAAM missile, but I wonder if there’s any plans on reworking thrust-vectoring in general or if we should submit bug reports for each missile’s thrust-vectoring issues
Should have used the regular German EF-2000 to get rid of the IRST
1 Like
afaik it will be the only 14.7 without MAWS otherwise. but the better RWR and more countermeasures will be nice regardless of MAWS
Speaking of tiny planes and vehicles gaijin should add but won’t due to copy and paste they should add the Finnish Hawks which were made in Finland as shown here
Resume
2 Likes
Would be nice to see this also for the Harriers so that VIFF’ing would be more effective.
1 Like
Pretty sure the Su-30SM2 doesn’t have MAWS either
2 Likes
Several thrust vectoring missiles like SRAAM have already had “reworks”. So its not exactly clear what you are asking here when asking about generic reworks. No there is no wider “rework” planned for this. Individual issues will be reviewed as reported.
1 Like
I wonder why you didn’t crop that image lol
1 Like
Seems like a rather predictable side effect of adding the Hawk 8 years late, you end up with some catching up to do.
1 Like
Takes too much effort when I can just highlight the important part
Could have kept that number at 4, if they didn’t add the premium T.1A
Then they could have added a South African or Indian one :)
Just wanted to ask about this, currently the two Indonesian vehicles (Harimau & 2RI) has British crew voices instead of what the patch notes mentioned above. Is this a client-side issue or a game-side issue?
1 Like
A very strange comment
Its not 8 years too late at all. All of the general advanced trainers and family memebers of this type have been introduced over the last 2 years.
Again, we have never had a rule where aircraft are added in chronological order. Particularly for the reason that the lower ranks, something which you yourself always advocate for, would never see new or interesting content, as everything would always be top tier.
