to many beer and pretzel i guess. Bevore we bought the Saab 105XT, we USA and the Soviet Union offerd us entire devision of planes for free! F86 and MiG 17! And we said no and bought 105XTs! Crazy!
who is we?
Both the Greek and Israeli M-346 are unarmed. The Israeli M-346 has been seen with inert weaponry however, but that’s it.
1 Like
More like 90% if we also consider @Bergebis’s mention of a suggestion of letting players choose which subtree to pair a nation with (with limits ofcourse). That could finally put an end to the endless debate over where Switzerland should go, since it has strong ties to both France and Germany. There’s no real way to satisfy both sides without splitting the Swiss tree, which would be a big no-no for me. As i really don’t want another Canada 2.0 treatment.
1 Like
Just checked your Bio…
you checked this out yet?: J35OE Mk2: The upgraded austrian Draken!
(I want this plane so badly, every vote counts)
Welcome to the Club!
1 Like
Why?
Eh. With how the folder rework is set up mixing and matching nation don’t work as it is just another tab, like air, ground and naval is. Just because it’s reusing features in game. So the host a sub-tree is attached to is still the only tree it can be joint with. (Plus some problems nations will push to be able to use vehicles from a nation it has no claim to, and whenever they bring up they should have that nation people from said nation tell them no.)
But also if we mix and match sub-trees might as well also allow for it to be down the same with the main nations. And at that point, every line up will just be the meta op vehicles. So I don’t support that system in any way.
Nobody wants a Canada 2.0, every Canadian and ANZAC player(pre-Aussie sub) made it clear how bad our treatment is. But at the same time with the requirements for sub-trees to get additions they host seem to want it as they get the same thing from the sub-tree being treated like Canada.(Filling one off gaps)
1 Like
To be fair, he knows the forum exists and where to find them. So if he wants to he can always come here to refute, but it’s quite bvious that he won’t and why not.
I have always theorized that he is just yet another aversge player that likes to hide behind “muh French players are universally better players”. Reddit gives him perfect privacy, if he were to post here he would have to give up that privacy.
1 Like
What the flum is that ?
5 Likes
yea thats also a real issue i guess i kinda got carried away lmao
“T/6 13C” is a really crazy addition. Never even heard of a plane known as that.
4 Likes
Even the most advanced AI still struggle with aircraft, tanks and guns etc
1 Like
Well whatever ai he’s using it’s rubbish even chat can do better than that mean while claude is crying in the corner as it been report users are being mean to it
Google Gemini, not sure if it was the brand new 4 Argon model though.
1 Like
Well for one the Germans or whoever uses Eurofighter would not willingly blow up their domestic manufacturing capability for an F-15 likely built an ocean away, so by keeping it there and only buying it to replace the Tornado they still have said manufacturing.
The other is the two aircraft (F-15EX, Eurofighter) share similar but different roles. Eurofighter is more of an interceptor, the F-15EX is 50:50 air superiority, strike aircraft, so no real reason to call it a successor of the former. Its best case is to introduce it as a Tornado replacement
(With that being said, a shame Poland didn’t buy F-15EX U_U)
Greece should have bough F-15s instead of F-35s…
Greece should of went down the Indonesian route and brought everything
6 Likes
we dont have the money for half the stuff Indonesia is buying…
5 Likes