No V-22 🥀🥀
Man am I really a German main ?
Weapons must be fixed to the airframe generally, hence why I haven’t suggested the Cypriot Valentine yet
1 Like
1 Like
Tie him down then
1 Like
Because I already suggested it:
(Shameless plug)
Although it’s the MV-22B since that one has actually been tested with rockets and ATGM’s.
1 Like
I live near Warner Robins AFB and I see WAY to many C-5’s for my liking
1 Like
this does remind me…
I should be getting back to work on this
2 Likes
someday in game???
Does this one count as an armed vehicle?
1 Like
Depending on how they do it I’m not sure I’d like that. I’m all for unfinished prototypes, but in this case I’m worried they’d just add equipment to the YF-23 demonstrator that was never intended rather than give us the actual intended combat aircraft that the F-23 would’ve been. Not that I’m against the YF-23, I just don’t think it should get any equipment not intended for the YF-23
- YF-23 (as built) ← real prototype aircraft
- F-23 (as intended) ← real planned combat aircraft that might count under unfinished prototype rules
- YF-23 equipped like F-23 ← fictional aircraft made from multiple things blended together
2 Likes
I think it has to be a military transport cause ain’t no way a beluga is flying in a active combat area
You don’t like it because it’s the greatest to ever do it :)
Doubt they’d add it before the F-22 tbh, would likely just get based off F-22’s performance in downtiers as I doubt it’d be the same BR as the F-35
It should except the weapon it carries needs to be in-game. I had my C-17A and MC-130J suggestions denied because JASSM isn’t in-game yet.
1 Like
It’s just fat
no counters so yes I suppose it would be DOA
I guess, looks like a gunpod to me ^^
technically it was armed with 7.7mm