Fair
People that use the CS/SA5 for its intended purpose are true heroes
If they can’t be bothered to add a bunch of seperate CIWS capable vehicles, they could at the very least add a Skyguard or that mobile Phalanx and give every Blufor nation access to that, similar to how the UCAVs work
Redfor can get a CS/SA5-like as their “free” vehicle
lowkey hate how they did its missiles tho, absolute bangers of dogshit.
modeled so well they entire model might be wrong
1 Like
is there any ww2 German bomber fanatic over here that knows a lot of stuff about the Ju-290s?
The OP of this suggestion, probably
1 Like
Hhhhmmm, I think the end 4.5’s next Gen IR and ECM/EW for Oct/Nov update. Next Gen Fox 3 will be for Christmas with the 5th Gens!
Huge doubt for EW, maybe a tiny bit of more modern ECM (probably towed decoys soon).
Personally, I’m not expecting IIR A2A missiles for this update, but if they are coming, I sure hope they won’t be made available at 13.0 and below…
Spoiler
Also still not sure who to believe when it comes to the R-74s “realness”
1 Like
That I think was confirmed by both sides to have shot down a MiG 29 at some insane distance! Sooo it probably fits this category of next Gen Fox 3…though the R77M probably more so
Exactly this. These missiles used by the S-300, BUK M3, SAMP/T, and Type 03 all cost tens of millions of dollars. They should not be machine gunning them willy nilly at everything in the sky. They should only fire if:
- The target is a high priority
- The target is close to, or within the NEZ
- The target has already been up high for a minumum length of time
- The target is above a certain altitude
- The missile has a high PK
- All of these would have 2 exceptions:
- The target has already beeen fired at (so they won’t just abandon a missile after it is already fired)
- The target is inside a certain range of the SAM site, and maybe also within a certain range of specific assets like the EWRs that are supposed to be given a function soon (this would represent a top priority target that must be destroyed)
This would stop the long range SAMs from shooting someone who just took off or is making a fast popup attack (for something like an S-300, there is no point at shooting someone who is popping up for a short period of time because they will quickly get back down to the ground and break LOS)
4 Likes
It should be compatible with any aircraft that can fire AMRAAMs, since its meant to replace them. It even shares the same dimensions.
It is an SM-6, just without the large booster.
I think Proto-EW/ECM (really basic implementation, just laying the framework) could be this coming major
1 Like
can anyone identify the plane in the back?
Don’t forget the Sargent Stout. It would probably be one of the better ones since it has proxy ammo and a hemispherical aesa radar like the Spyder AIO with 360x65 degree scanning angles.
1 Like
kinda reminds me of a Wellington
The data min about the towed decoy I think is a dead give away
Looks like a Wellington, dunno what else it could be
If we restrict the SAMs to be more realistic, shouldn’t we also restrict the players?
I don’t think the militaries would put full loads of A2A missiles on planes or let them fly with only A2G and no A2A weapons
It wasn’t even just a datamine, there were controls added to the dev server for firing towed decoys and similar things. Though that was probably a mistake, I don’t think they meant to reveal that so early.
1 Like