Easy way to kill the entire plane off, but that would be very Gaijin.
F-15EX devblog today, i know it
Also does Warthunder mobile count as activity for Warthunder forum?
3 Likes
Idk if it has it but DL + IIR would make the aircraft act like 11.3 IRCCM spammers
Or like a Mirage F1
Python 5 doesn’t have DL in game, so I seriously doubt that Python 4 would get it.
It would be more like playing the Belgian F-16As in a 12.7-13.3 game.
3rd gen infrared Air-to-Air Missile replace with 5th gen infrared Air-to-Air Missile (initial) for 3rd gen fighter aircraft, 4th gen fighter aircraft and strike aircraft (late 1990’s ~ late 2010’s era)
For Belgian, Dutch and Norwegian F-16AM MLU. increase battle rating (Air AB, RB, SB) to 14.3
F-15E, F-16CM Blk 50, Mirage 2000 5F, F-15J(M), RTAF JAS 39C, USMC F/A-18C late, F-15I Ra’am, Mirage 2000-5EG and F-16I Sufa battle rating (Air AB, RB, SB) up to 14.7 ~ 15.0
Personally, AIM-9X-2 for american 4+ gen fighter aircraft with AESA radar (late 2019 ~ 2020’s era)
F-15E, F-16CM Blk 50, F-16AM MLU and F/A-18C late (USN) armed AIM-9X Blk 1
Continually complaining is a great way to get views and is easy content.
I sometimes watched his stuff when I came across it, but I really started disliking him after his Heavy Cavalry update video, where he used a clickbait-ass thumbnail that wasn’t even remotely close to being factually true.
And the worst part was when he advocated for Gaijin to basically stop making anything for naval and remove copy-pasted vehicles, despite players having already put a ton of time into unlocking and grinding that content. Especially when he was talking about how quitting feels bad because you’re losing all that hard work. Yet apparently it’s fine to remove someone else’s vehicles and even entire game modes just because he personally doesn’t enjoy them.
Then, after getting criticized for his stance on naval, he backpedaled by saying he meant naval should be improved and that everyone had misunderstood him. Lmao. To me, that just came across as backpedaling because he didn’t want to admit that he had a shitty opinion.
4 Likes
Him complaining about Russia getting the T-90M Arena was peak, acting like it was an incredibly strong tank when calling it mid is already being kind to it.
3 Likes
Top-tier Russia, especially on the mbt side, is pretty mid. Their CAS is really their saving grace for anything post 12.0, but aside from that, their tanks are fairly easy to deal with as nato tanks actually get some decent rounds up there.
10.3–11.3 Russia is a different story, though, since they have some absolutely stacked lineups there and excellent vehicles like the T-80UD.
1 Like
why? toptier is BVR mostly anyway, F-16s have no place there with just 6 missiles, getting AIM-9X/IRIS-T wont be game changing for them
Will IR Mica be even that good?
We bake our rant here in forums idk what they are putting in them outside
That’s cause, they only make videos they know, people will hate watch
1 Like
I wouldn’t trust that at the moment though.
CAMM is meant to have DL but I dont think it’s enabled currently
It is, they fixed it some time ago.
Missed that they had fixed it
What will be the new ammunition type bvvd talked about ?
cope for anti-airfield weaponry
AFDS mostly for the AUP
1 Like
Only options are:
- CBUs (were beta tested during the NT event on MLRSs)
- Anti-Runway / Cratering weapons (this could be part of CBUs though with things like JP233)
- Decoy / EW weapons (Like Spear-EW)
- Cruise missiles (like Storm Shadow)
or it could be a new seeker on an existing weapon type
- IIR seekers for A2A missiles (probably not actually IIR, but things like ASRAAM, Aim-9X, etc added to aircraft)
- MMW (things like Brimstones and GBU-53)
The final option could be nukes as loadout options rather than relying on a generic default aircraft for the role.
It could also have been a miss translation and it was referring to Towed Radar Decoys. (Which we saw a control for on the last dev server)
I havent seen any other ideas for what it could be except for those.
2 Likes
Yes
1 Like
Day 14 of waiting for Cypriot sub tree