Yes MW-1 that’s what it could be which may be count as cluster
No. The KH-47m2 is the Russian Kinzhal missile, and the MACE is the new one spotted on a super hornet a few days ago. Both are hypersonic air to ground missiles.
1 Like
RIP AA is gajin adds this in 10 years lol
What do you mean adding the Server Nuker 9000 could have potential consequences?
1 Like
I think we will get cargo vehicles with f15EX on the side dish this update along with early cluster bombs and weapons new IR seeker
so next update in less than a month it seems or close to a month since BVVD said new nuclear thunder mode testing in 1-2 weeks before update
There are cluster bombs like the CBU-97 and CBU-105 that have guided bomblets. They have a laser and IR sensor that detects any vehicles, and if they detect one, they guide onto the target detonating an explosively formed penetrator capable of penetrating up to 7.5 inches of armor.
I know that the AIM-7M has HOJ, as that was one of the major improvements over the AIM-7F
We could get the other CV90120
1 Like
That’s not gonna be added based on functionality alone
It’s a dispenser, rather than a bomb. It shoots out various types of bomblets and minelets outwards to spread across the battlefield or an airfield.
The standard configuration for a load consisting of just KB44s contains 4536 bomblets.
You wouldn’t really have any control over where they land, so it would be almost impossible to use effectively in WT.
Those are the ones I am worried about the most, especially if they were to be added to GRB
AIM-7M, Super 530D, R-27R/ER. Those are just the ones I can recall (if correct) off the top.
Wouldn’t make sense for them to add the Blk 1 when they can just copy and paste the Blk 2 onto whatever aircraft they want, as that version is already in game.
1 Like
Just checked the length of the runway on the big airfield in NE is actually roughly 3,000m from the spawn point to the end of the runway so a fully loaded C-5M should actually be able to take off from it since it requires around 2,500m of runway. Although granted it’s quite a small margin it should actually be possible.
For a C-5M to land at max weight it’s actually roughly only 1,500m so that would be entirely possible too.
But the difference between the Block 1 and the Block 2 is that the Block 2 got datalink, which is just a single toggle for them to add/remove it.
After take-off it’s gonna need like what, 10 minutes to reach a good altitude and once it has finished its mission, its gonna need another 10 to 20 minutes to land again
True, but that is technically still more work than simply copy and pasting the Blk 2 onto aircraft as is.
interesting so we can keep those airfields but should they spawn closer? due to lack of speed I did actually use b-52 at 13.3 NE BR It was able to take off but I couldnt land it may be that’s just my skill issue but we should at least have some bigger airfeildss like airport size (and desert NE) because a fully loauded c5 with 700k pounds in it I still dont think it will be able to make that lift
I did that with b52 it’s much shorter flight than it seems (I was sea lvl) I was trying to destory the carrier
So, a one-way trip without climbing
You think cargo would survive a drop from an altitude where parachutes don’t have enough time to open?