Next Major Update - Rumor Roundup & Discussion (Part 2)

[Rzi4628-live]

your back

[Pheonix_RX01]

Yus

[Zulizia]

Even happened this update :)

@Zulizia

day one of the new major and already asking about the next

[panzerman13]

Along with the LDIRCM rework do you guys think MUSS will get a buff to make it more useful against ir fnf missiles

[Pvt_Wade]

would be the 3rd event plane to get CCIP for no reason

[panzerman13]

Hopefully

[KhorneFlakez1337]

I know the F4D-1 had ahistorial CCIP, what other event vehicle was there with ahistorical CCIP?

[KhorneFlakez1337]

It shouldn’t have CCIP

[Pvt_Wade]

Tu-95 and B-52 (they don’t have HUD)

[Ulquiorra6]

What happened to the “[W.I.P.]” posts? Were the late-year updates posted too early for Gaijin to allow them to be published? Like the M7 one

[mineLo]

@panzerman13

MUSS will get a buff to make it more useful against ir fnf missiles

… why would it?

[panzerman13]

Is it not a LDIRCM for ir missiles?

[Smin1080p_WT]

@Deadsnake_war2

@Smin1080p_WT regarding the M1 KVT, will it’s model be changed from the Base M1 Abrams model to the correct M1A1 Abrams model, since argument back in the day it was a top tier iirc ?
Now that the M1A1 one being moved up to 12.0 and both the base M1 Abrams moving up tier 11.0, or is there no plans for it to be changed ?

Theres no plans for this no, since the Click-Bait fills that role already:

As with most premiums, the KVT is an “inspired by” rather than a 1:1. It fills its intended role (As a 105mm M1) correctly. So theres no plans to change it.

[Morvran]

Bucs technically. That would include the Buc S1.

Should have CCRP and the bomber sight, but technically not CCIP iirc

[mineLo]

MUSS is a soft kill APS IR dazzler. It blinds the receiver end of a SACLOS system so it can’t give useful guidance commands to a missile (like the TOW). Best it could do is affect IR AAMs but that is besides the point. It is not DIRCM

[panzerman13]

Id rather it have ahistorical ccip considering you literally dont get any other weaponry at all. Gives it at least some form of usability so its not just a game of having to lean in close to the screen in cockpit veiw to maybe pick out a target

[KhorneFlakez1337]

Huh, never thought about that

Wouldn’t hurt to take it away, since they have regular bombsights

[KhorneFlakez1337]

@panzerman13

Gives it at least some form of usability so its not just a game of having to lean in close to the screen in cockpit veiw to maybe pick out a target

That’s part of the game though?

Might as well give CCIP to everything, if that was a problem

[Smin1080p_WT]

@Kobes-Kamov

Hi Smin,

Recently one of the Challenger 2 ready rack reports was reviewed and rejected, while I disagree with the reasoning I do believe that there is a more conclusive report that already exists and provides the proof this report requests.

Community Bug Reporting System

Therefore, I was wondering if you could provide any update on if Flame2512s report has been looked at recently?

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/nzUoCC2yxJx5

This report was accepted over 3 years ago and appears to provide the evidence that Gaijin are looking for based on the response to the previously reviewed report.

Thank you!

Hello

The developers saw this information as well, but sadly, due to conflicting information, the full documents that were used in the report were required to complete the investigation.

Partly this was to ensure there are no further discrepancies or unknowns.

A new report can be made if the full documentation can be acquired, but as these are archive scans acquired at a cost (often extensive), we wouldn’t expect players to do this as a requirement. But without them, we sadly cant proceed with the matter. So based on the available evidence there was in the original report, it was reviewed and resolved based on that.

[panzerman13]

Just remove ccip then if we shouldnt be allowed to use it for sights or systems that help with bomb drops