We’ve had larger gaps at the start of seasons.
4 Likes
The M1 KVT was 3 years ago?
Ouch my bones
6 Likes
Look out, they are gonna claim that this was an outlier
Why are people so damn pressed about when or what, it’ll come when it comes go do somthing else. Its not like it won’t be there later
2 Likes
I mean, we could simply look at last major too.
5 days between the Ki-93 and PLZ45. 5 more between that and the Giulio Cesare.
Its not really an exception at all. Early on in the season always has gaps betwen blogs.
The Oct/November season is always a short and sweet one as the major itself is often one of the “smaller” content wise of the year in terms of vehicle numbers. Primarily because its only a month or so either side of a larger major.
5 Likes
Always the same every major sadly :(
2 Likes
Update withdrawal is hitting hard
(even though the last update wasn’t that long ago)
Don’t people will be day one of the new update “asking when blog for the next update”.
1 Like
Could they designate targets mid flight like you can in WT, or did they have to be pre-programmed on the ground?
@Smin1080p_WT regarding the M1 KVT, will it’s model be changed from the Base M1 Abrams model to the correct M1A1 Abrams model, since argument back in the day it was a top tier iirc ?
Now that the M1A1 one being moved up to 12.0 and both the base M1 Abrams moving up tier 11.0, or is there no plans for it to be changed ?
I believe they already said in the past that the model chosen on purpose and that it won’t be changed
Hi Smin,
Recently one of the Challenger 2 ready rack reports was reviewed and rejected, while I disagree with the reasoning I do believe that there is a more conclusive report that already exists and provides the proof this report requests.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ojFgCJ6Jnos4?comment=flbsTOt68dX2Skd4kPopod0K
Therefore, I was wondering if you could provide any update on if Flame2512s report has been looked at recently?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/nzUoCC2yxJx5
This report was accepted over 3 years ago and appears to provide the evidence that Gaijin are looking for based on the response to the previously reviewed report.
Thank you!
1 Like
No, with the PUMA u14 release they said that these cosmetic premiums are not designed to be exact matches with their real life counterparts such as the u14 having a spike launcher despite the vehcile it was based on not having one
2 Likes
it was labelled as duplicate and added to the report that was denied (i think) which is confusing considering theres literally nothing to prove it incorrect in the report(s)
I’m not entirely sure how gaijin do it, there’s a few duplicate reports now and I don’t know how one being rejected is going to impact the others.
They are duplicate in subject matter, but Flames report and Knight’s report are very different in content.
Notice something, the more non-vehicle news for upcoming majors= more peak updates cause big name vehicles are for the trailers. So this update is gonna be peak
well lets hope are good friend smin can help
It’s an October/November update, don’t expect too much
hopefully
You simply aimed in the aiming reticle then straightened your aircraft to fly above it and the bomb would release on its own. Basicly a smart bombsight. the rockets worked similarly you would set the aimpoint with your sight and some altitude adjustments and then on your attack run at an altitude the rockets would fire off and make impact at the desired target
1 Like