And remove lend lease & captured stuff too.
2 Likes
Those are the first to go; it’s the stuff they claim is “unique” just because they are in X nation, eg., the SEP v3, which, if it’s C&P in one nation, it’s C&P in both; after all, the US already had a bunch of Abrams.
It’s a good thing War Thunder has always had an operator focus(which it leaned even harder into with sub-trees), allowing these variants in-game. I know nations that would have big holes in their trees, as they are filled with stuff not domestic to them, like the US and Germany.
3 Likes
And then we are back to square one with people asking for their home nation to be added and oops we’re right back where we started xD.
Top tip if you dislike how content is being added there are two options compain, or leave lol
1 Like
Good news: they are complaining, usually paired with suggestions to forgo X nation’s history with Y nation, when Y nation has options (that they don’t already have) that don’t need them to forget WW2 is most of War Thunder.
1 Like
They could add F-16B/D in A-10C line up, below AV-8B and label it as Strke aircraft/jet fighter
You mean the South African sub tree? the only people that hate that one are British purists and barring the G6 and the Badger all of the vehicles are actually pretty good…
1 Like
British purist or just Morvan lol
4 Likes
Considering the one piece of advice I got from even the none purists was to avoid and replace South African stuff as soon as possible I doubt that. (Even more when my own experience validate that)
As the vehicles I remember it’s because they where trash and the others where forgettable just do to better option form the UK or other nations with vehicles in the UK tree at the BR. Churchills with further mobility nerfs, are some of the most common feelings I had with South Africa.
The large group of people calling it good are those who don’t even play the UK (main other nations) or it’s a lower priority grind from my observations, of WT players elsewhere and not just here
Yeah kinda implied by the J-22 premium, it is a personal cope right now
I hate zero contribution vehicles to block tech tree additions, for example you can think of why we still not have an AMX-30C2
Or I hate why the said sub trees do not include vehicles that countries actually add something from them, for example why all Finnish modified aircraft are premium?
Edit: Also I do not have any problems with 3 line trees and huge capability gaps all around.
4 Likes
Not having the 1A5BE wouldn’t make actually getting the AMX-30C2 any more likely lol.
3 Likes
Hi Ron. It’s really a pity u cant get guns on JAS-39d. Same for Grippen F.
Not saying per map nor per mode.
Speak for yourself. Britain is my most played nation and I can unequivocally say the South African subtree is the best in the game, and has a number of really fun vehicles. Maybe they don’t fit your playstyle but that’s fine, it gives players options. You don’t have to use the MTTD at 9.3, you can use the VFM5 instead. Or both, like I do.
3 Likes
Yeah but it gave us a good example why sub trees need to slow down, and after Israel also got one, end coming.
1A5BE needs external modeling while 30C2 is identical to 30B2
No Belgian ammo except the HE round got added, and it is 3 months late
So they one: did not consider local modifications and two: did not take the easier route till the domestic vehicle comes, unlike they advertise
What he posz?
Well, showing nuance about the Leopard 1A5BE discussion doesn’t really matter. whenever I’ve seen this discussion come up, it basically always ends up being about how, whenever a subtree vehicle gets added, whether the vehicles are unique or not, it takes development time and resources away from the main tree, which are for some reason considered inherently more important additions by a few, so anything related to subtrees is considered inherently bad,
3 Likes
F-15EX devboat today, i know it
2 Likes
something freaky
wont say anymore than that since discussing deleted posts is against the forum rules
1 Like