Next Major Update - Rumor Roundup & Discussion (Part 1)

[racimazzedine]

doesnt matter by your logic.

its a big gun

[KhorneFlakez1337]

M551 and M60A2 as well

[Ulquiorra6]

Smin can we expect something for tomorrow, about the next update? Or is gonna take a little more?

[TheDidact99]

add T58 and T30 at this point no XD?

[KhorneFlakez1337]

True, those would count

The Centurion AVRE and M728 CEV as well

[Danzig_A11]

object 219M with Burlak or the normal 219M with the goofy ahh rear facing Arena would be fine tbh

[TheDidact99]

anything that doesn’t have -4km reverse :')

[Sebbo_the_Plebbo]

@Smin1080p_WT

I think its pretty clear what aircraft I was referring too, as its quite logically noticeable when they started:

Was it clear? Subsonic twin seat trainers/light attackers have been added to the game for 6 years at this point.

[Nowel]

@TheDidact99

anything that doesn’t have -4km reverse :')

IIRC they used t80bv’s hulls so we are saved

[KhorneFlakez1337]

A Soviet/Russian MBT with more than 4km/h reverse speed?

What’s next? One with 10 degrees of gun depression?

[TheDidact99]

the humble BUK with infinite reverse gear, if only we could have some of that XD

[Nowel]

@KhorneFlakez1337

What’s next? One with 10 degrees of gun depression?

Thats heresy

[TheDidact99]

@Nowel_

t80bv’s hulls so we are saved

219M is indeed a T80BV hull, you remember good

Object 219M — The T-80BVM's superior precursor

poll Object 219M [Flag_of_Russia.svg] [Obj. 219M] TL;DR: T-80BV modernisation prototype fitted with Relikt, Arena hard-kill APS, and a 1400hp engine. The more conservative T-80BVM was chosen for production instead. History The T-80BV entered service in 1985, differing from the earlier T-80B with improved upper glacis composite armour and Kontakt-1 ERA across the hull and turret front. In the early 2000s, Spetsmash — the St Petersburg-based Special Design Bureau — began development on a n…

[racimazzedine]

@TheDidact99

anything that doesn’t have -4km reverse :')

2022 T-80BVM you say ?

- YouTube

[Nowel]

I forgot about the 1400hp, that thing is eating good

[TheDidact99]

infinitely prefer it over the T80BVM, really sad cheaper won at the end of the day

[WillKMJ]

I’ve been begging Gaijin to no avail since they removed the IRST21 sadly :(

[Alebang]

Gaijin give me the T-80BVM obr.2022 and my wallet is yours.

[MAUSWAFFE]

Ah, that’s fair then. In the meantime I think there is a lot of other things that can be added first then.

For Malaysia this could mean expanding further down with rank V options like the CL-41G or MB-339AM, and looking at the tree as a whole there’s still an ominous Indonesia shaped hole in the fourth line

[Smin1080p_WT]

@Sebbo_the_Plebbo

Was it clear? Subsonic twin seat trainers/light attackers have been added to the game for 6 years at this point.

We seem to just be moving goalposts over and over at this point for some sort of point scoring or “gotcha” at this stage. The actual constructive purpose to this topic or discussion I’m not really sure of.

Yes, it was quite clear by the aircraft I listed, all of which fall into the same category and typing and all arrived from the same time period onwards. These Swedish aircraft above were some of the only strike options for the Swedish tree in its infancy. The same is not true of the British tree with the Hawk. Which has a plethora of strike capable aircraft around that BR.

The Hawks were perfectly in line with all the rest of the similar advanced jet trainers of a similar age and category, which were all planned to arrive over a similar time period.

@Smin1080p_WT