nah
do you also see the moving outer part that the J-16 also has
1 Like
yes its there if i close my eyes ( i should ask AI to generate a J-16 with F-15 intakes)
since the EFT´s intakes also totally look like these they should all have the same CL
1 Like
please no we get the idea they aren’t the same stop dragging it
you said that they are the same
1 Like
also the Mig-25
1 Like
MiG-29 as well
The guy is just a bit special.
have you seen the intakes on the F-14 and Super Hornet?
they are also square
1 Like
Holy moly
You’ve opened my eyes
Even the Tornado has the same intakes!!!1!one!!!
1 Like
What sources do you have for the engine’s thrust to know it has 0 installation penalties?
1 Like
He made bigger and more relevant claims that I would focus on, he’s saying the J-16 has zero thrust installation penalties. Is that normal? Does the J-16 have different intakes than the J-11? Does the J-11 have zero thrust installation penalties?
1 Like
he just knows
it came to him in a dream
just like the information that the J-16 and F-15 intakes are identical
3 Likes
Surely I won’t find bug reports claiming that the thrust for those planes is wrong as well
And they definitely won’t have the same reason for rejection as the ones for the F-15s
Spoiler
1 Like
Day 1324 of waiting for Polish tech tree
8 Likes
I would like to see some proof FROM from gaijin or someone defending this that they used real math and didn’t pull something out about the -22% thrust when installed and that J-16 isnt over performing
bro you are claiming its wrong, burden of proof belongs to you
also where does this -22% number even come from
2 Likes
it also belongs to you since you decided to say that f-15 isn’t underperforming and that J-16 engines are just fine