I’m not being an expert or acting like one its simple that’s according AN EXPERTS math that the 4-8% is true for a good engine real engineers made that not me -20% is insane
Then get the calculations from those experts and make a report quoting their calculations
yea I’m sure I will just dial up the engineers who made pw229 and ask them for classified information so a video game would stop nerfing a engine
So, you don’t actually know whether Gaijins calculations are wrong then
I do because engineers publicly said a good intake system and a good engine is about 4-8% loss of thrust when installed NOT -22% pulled straight from trust snail bro
If you have a source then bug report it, shouldn’t be too difficult to gain some attention once you make it.
2 Likes
I can try but I’m not expecting much of anything
Might as well
you know that the intakes of the J-16 and F-15 are vastly different?
1 Like
Go find a reliable source stating the installed thrust (not the static thrust) and put it in a bug report then
lol
lmao even
I’m guessing Ron means by size not anything else
they are quite literally far apart from each other
have you looked at an F-15 and a J-16 ;) lmao
1 Like
wrong
they have different shapes and are using different mechanisms for the intake ramps
No, they obviously are the same
The J-16s intakes definitely a different distance apart, shorter, smaller, located lower or anything like that
please tell me you read F-15 as J-15
he didnt
he was talking about the channel losses on the f-15 compared to the j-16 the whole time
I see no difference, do you?