0 14.7s
lets focus on the aesa one. i dont see someone who would take a mechanical radar over aesa one. like playing the T1 eft while having the aesa. thats the part i am in.
F15C GE

Thank you for the source! I’ve therefore changed my comment;
Honestly, if they applied ALL of the following changes, Centauro 2 may be worth something;
-Autoloader’s rate of fire should be 3 seconds.
-The loader, who’s sitting right there, should be able to load the gun manually when the autoloader is emptied/broken, instead of locking fire till the autoloader is replenished/repaired (5 seconds aced).
-The time to replenish the first order rack should be reduced.
Honestly, this would make Centauro 2 and Italian Top Tier actually worth SOMETHING outside of Leopard 2A7HU. To such degree, that EVEN I would grind it at last.
Sempre uno splendore vedere i gioielli di punta Italiani all’opera :)
China has 3 even if you move the J-15T down?
J-10C
F-16V
J-15T
Question…are exceptions made at Gaijins choosing??? Not saying they will show up or not…but isn’t it the same case with the German EFT and many here have said the 30SM2 should not be what it is??? Sooooo?
That’s balancing issues or players believing that an aircraft does not perform irl as it does in game. It’s two completely different things with what vehicles does Gaijin adds
Ooook so Balance Issue F15IA to Israel XD 🤞
israel wont get a jet that wasnt even build yet
just like it wont get the Ah-64E before it gets delivered
Literally just
- No dual racks as the only “evidence” is a wrongly interpreted picture of 2 R-77-1 on its underbelly
- Bars radar compatible with R-37 + higher max search range, not Irbis-E. Literally every search (including manufacturer!) doesn’t state it has Irbis.
And that’s it.
Some people argue the engines too but most sources in most places says it does have them, so…
- If/when R-77M becomes a thing, it doesn’t get it but I know the urge to give it R-77M will be astronomical
already explained multiple times, its a prototype aeasa plane that get tested
german planes are compatible as has been shown
specialy added was the version shown of from 2007
they essentialy added a prototype. A vehicle essentialy developed by south africa itself.
The gripen e thailand is not underdevelopment by thailand, as its the case with both examples you brought up, they are developments by their own countries with prototypes and steps being shown
The naval event is coming to an end in a few days. What will be the next event, tank? plane?
you should be able to answer that yoursel.
Chances are Smin himself doesnt even know about the missle yet.
It wont come anytime soon and likely cant be answered
malice*
Sadly for me, plane.
I’m still looking forward to that Object 640 :')
heck the development just startet/was announced,. already asking for it is a joke
Either name is correct, refer to navy.mil overview of the missile
Obviously not if they have rounds made and in flight testing
