Technically it was delivered to the Japanese Forces, because it never went to Japan that doesn’t mean it wasn’t delivered
that ones wrong
The first handover actualy was 2022 lol
Gotta love nation tourist
Also no. AH-64E might not actually be bought by Israel after all if they deem they don’t need AH-64E over their own AH-64D. Israel has not paid for them.
So the deal may not go through.
Whereas Thai Gripen E has been bought and confirmed. Deliveries will take place 2025-2030.
2 Likes
Deliveries will take place 2025? oh look its already nearly 2027, and nothing has been handed over yet? lol
They gonna get them when they get them, once handed over. 2a7Hu, KF41 it has been the case for all vehicles of modern time.
Nice job of you to ignore the embarrasment of the KF41, IF you wanna ignore it, you are better of deleting your whole post
No you are correct on KF41. Well spotted.
But don’t twist Gaijin’s rule on undelivered vehicles - There is none.
Smin denied the Israeli AH-64E because while the US has approved the possible Foreign Military Sale. Israel themselves has yet to purchase it.
Not because the AH-64E is not in Israel yet. But because we don’t know if the AH-64E will even BE in Israel.
1 Like
Either way, vehicles for tech trees arent added until they finaly handed over.
Else they arent modelable. There could always be changes to the vehicle, changes in the camouflage and so on
You are right.
For example, Indonesia and Taiwan AH-64Es are supposed to be different in Avionics and AMASE/Countermeasures. Plus they are not supposed to get LDIRCM.
But yet, Gaijin modelled them to be the same. Most notably giving them LDIRCM blocks which they definitely did not intend to get.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
2 Likes
i’m just here praying gaijin stops screwing over the minor nations, they have original stuff to add, that they’d want, they still have notable gaps in vehicles/airframes, some progression gaps and missing capabilities
the WIP progress posts with the avon-sabre and the M7 tank give me some hope, but if the rest is just another round of copyslop, i’ll be disapointed.
1 Like
Is the Wildcat (the heli), the new Japanese plane or even the new Chinese SPG “copyslop”? For now this update is looking very promising
1 Like
this update does look promising, but there is still time for gaijin to disapoint, and we’ll have to wait and see if this spirit behind this update carries on over to the next one
1 Like
That is why we have aesa eurofighter ? A planned south african ifv ?
Also pretty sure i remember talk about the eurofighter model being generic enough because of possible changes to the model, and well, gaijin assumed that Germany would get the IRST, things that it didn’t.
Some tech trees could easily get 8 or 9 lines without even doing that… but for now I guess 5 lines is enough
They have been tested and that’s enough for Gaijin, The AH-64E or F-15IA haven’t been tested by Isreal
1 Like
Ok ? That is not about what i’m replying to and i’m not saying the opposite of what you are saying.
Yea I meant to reply to the other guy that Gaijin adds stuff that are been tested and never gotten in service
2 Likes
what ? hell no. you already got like 4 different one
I count 3:
F-15C GE
F/A-18E
PoBIT.
And calling the F/A-18E and PoBIT (F-16V as well) top tier aircraft is already a stretch. They are only at that BR because Gaijin forces them to be there.
2 Likes
i count 2 since F-16 is a 14.0 worthy but gaijin being gaijin with their br.
but yes that still 1 -2 more than the avrage tech tree. am i saying they should not get new plane ? no
do they need it ? no
If we count 14.3-14.7:
- Germany has 2
- Russia has 2
- Britain has 3
- Japan has 1
- China has 2 (although the J-15T should move down to 14.3)
- Italy has 2
- France has 2
- Sweden has 1
- Israel has 0
So the US is pretty in line with most nations in terms of quantity of 14.3-14.7 capable aircraft.