True, i forgot about that, guess i have to wait till trailer then :(
Won’t have to wait long comrade, it’s only a few weeks out.
Would it be foldered in the F-14 folder considering its literally the same as B minus ability to combine missiles on the belly?
Thats the current plan yes. Subject to change of course.
Its final placement has not been set.
4 Likes
Speaking of current plans, F/A-18F for USA? I know this drum was beat endlessly not that long ago, but given current… changes to original plans with the F-14D, is this one too likely to change?
2 Likes
We dont have any plans currently. Its equivalent allready exists in the tree, being the E. They are functionally identical.
2 Likes
There is no reason not to do it. Imo there are to few differences between the B and D for it to not be folded.
as much its memed, the event is where such things live, its visual flavor and 200kg. Tho its probably too high of a BR.
Could possibly come as non ESA superhorny
Bummer, would’ve been a nice excuse to have a Block III Super Hornet 🥲
We could always get the F/A-18XT for a twin seat super hornet. Would be a Block III but with enough differences for it to be added.
1 Like
Good thing someone suggested it.
2 seater Super Hornet to USA:
The question now is… Premium vehicle or TT?
Personally I think as a squadron vehicle. Have an E Block III in the TT either after or foldered with the Block II with tha XT being a top tier squadron vehicle.
Why the interest for a Super Hornet F?
Super Hornet E is literally, LITERALLY identical in every possible way, except that it performs marginally better for being lighter.
Because it looks cooler than the single seat. Also it’s right there already in-game it should be simple enough to slap US markings on it and chuck it in a folder with the E.
3 Likes
An entire vehicle added to a tree over a minor visual difference between it and the one already present in the tree…?
Wouldn’t be the first time
What, rn ?