Boeing Advanced Super Hornet: The Ultimate Rhino That Never Was

Would you like to see F/A-18XT Advanced Super Hornet in-game?
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

History
In 1980s, United States Navy Carrier Air Wing (CVW) was extremely capable. The F-14, F/A-18 and A-6 (and also EA-6B) combinations which built on the assumption of Soviet threats, had no blind spots. However the good old days were passing slowly. The massive cuts in defense budget due to the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1992 had a significant impact on the Navy.

At that time, the Navy had serious trouble in finding successor of aging A-6. The A-6F program was cancelled, and A-12 Avenger II was failed because of cost overruns. The last attempt, A/F-X which was planned to replace both F-14 and A-6, was also dropped. However the Navy still had some options, the JSF and new enlarged F/A-18.

Back in the late 1987, the McDonnell Douglas evaluated several ‘advanced’ F/A-18 concepts in Hornet 2000 study. Although there were differences between each design, they shared the common characteristics: enlarged wings, more powerful engines, more fuel. This concepts form the basis of new strike fighter, F/A-18E/F. Despite of some criticism (especially from F-14 supporters), there is no doubt that the E/F Hornet was most suitable and affordable near-term option for Navy.

The first flight of Super Hornet happened in November 29, 1995. It entered service in 1999, and achieved initial operating capability two years later. Even after introduction of F-35C, the Super Hornets are still remains the backbone of naval aviation. It is also nicknamed ‘Rhino’, which was inspired by protruded IFF antenna on its nose.

Later, the Super Hornet once again evolved to the Advanced Super Hornet. This variant which made its prototype flight in 2013, was a further development of the Block II and used to be referred as the Super Hornet Block III. However there were no customers interested in ASH, so it never became operational. But some of the key elements such as the more advanced glass cockpit and the DTP-N survived, and later adopted in the real Super Hornet Block III.


Design


Airframe


The Advanced Super Hornet is based on the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet Block II. The best known is the two-seat version based on the F/A-18F, but a single-seat version was also built.

Conformal Fuel Tank

CFT for F/A-18E/F


The Advanced Super Hornet featured the conformal fuel tank (CFT) for the Super Hornet. Each CFT weighs 870 lbs (395 kg), and can hold 3,500 lbs (1,587 kg) of useable fuel.

The Super Hornet’s CFT is notable for zero negative impact on drag. In fact, it not only has no parasitic drag, it actually reduces drag even further.

Unlike the MAW/LWS and EWP described below, a prototype of the CFT was actually built and subsequently considered by the Navy. Therefore, this will be the most distinctive feature that distinguishes the standard F/A-18F from the Advanced Super Hornet.

Engine
image

The Advanced Super Hornet demonstrator uses General Electric F414-GE-400 engine like the normal Rhino. However the F414 Enhanced Performance Engine (F414 EPE) with 26,000 lbf of thrust (20% increase over normal F414) were proposed. According to the GE, the F414 EPE could be upgraded from the legacy F414 engines by retrofit.

Radar cross section reduction

The Advanced Super Hornet retains all radar cross-section (RCS) reduction features of the F/A-18E/F. Most of gaps are filled with form-in-place (FIP) sealant or conductive FIP sealant, and corrosion-proof radar absorbing material (RAM) was applied in many places including inlet lip , duct, vertical tail openings, vents, screens, flap hinges and fairings, pylons, external tanks. A multi-layer RAM is also used in few locations.

This made Rhino the least observable U.S. non-stealth fighter, with a same level of RCS (1 m²) to the Eurofighter or Rafale.

Engine inlet device of F/A-18E/F


One more thing to note is the engine inlet device (EID) located in front of F414 engine’s inlet guide vane. The EID, usually known as “radar blocker”, is fixed in place rather than rotate and conceals engine fan blade from radar wave. This helps significantly with RCS reduction, while also making it harder to identify via NCTR.

Avionics
Radar

Data on AN/APG-79 radar


image

image

The Advanced Super Hornet uses AN/APG-79 active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar, which is based on AN/APG-73 radar. It consists of 1,100 T/R modules with a power of 21 KVA and cooling performance of 15.6 kW.

The APG-79 features superior detection/tracking range, ability to track twice as many targets than APG-73 and performing scan with up to 2,800 radar beams per second. According to Raytheon, it could scan at nearly the speed of light.

EO sensors

Specifications of AN/ASQ-228 ATFLIR

Weight: 420 lb (191 kg)
Resolution: 640 × 480 pixel
Field of view:

  • NFOV: 0.7°
  • MFOV: 2.8°
  • WFOV: 6.0°

For air-to-ground mission, Super Hornet could mount AN/ASQ-228 ATFLIR on station 5.

Pilot device
image

JHMCS symbology for F/A-18 series aircraft

image


image

image

Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System (JHMCS) provides a collimated symbology/imaginary and FLIR/IRST pictures to pilot. It could also be used in conjunction with radar and AIM-9 missile for high off boresight target acquisition.


Armament, Countermeasures

F/A-18E/F loadout example

In terms of weapons, Advanced Super Hornet retains all capability of the F/A-18E/F.

image

Just like normal Super Hornet, ASH is equipped with four AN/ALE-47 countermeasure dispensers that could hold 30 chaff or flares each.

data on ALE-50 and ALE-55

image
image



image
image

In addition to these, there is a three AN/ALE-50 or AN/ALE-55 towed decoy under fuselage, directly behind centerline hardpoint. These expendable decoys are connected to the aircraft with fiber optics to provide continuous jamming while ‘following’ aircraft.

image
image

data on TADIRCM pod

image
image
image
image
image
image

There is an optional DIRCM pod called Tactical Aircraft Directed Infrared Countermeasures. TADIRCM consisted with six 256 × 256 pixel FPA missile detector sensors and two Agile Eye II laser-based IR jammers, and could be mounted on outboard wing pylon. The pod was actually functional and performed well during tests.


Proposed Components
Note: This section deals with potentially unfinished equipment.

image
image

The Advanced Super Hornet was to be equipped with the IRST, MAW and LWS. The MAW/LWS sensors were distributed to provide full spherical coverage.

Details on EWP


Structure of EWP

image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image

The EWP is probably the most iconic feature of the Advanced Super Hornet proposal. It is a stealthy weapon pod with 900 lbs (408 kg) of weight and ability to carry up to 2,500 lbs (1,133 kg) of weapons. Along with the CFT, this has the effect of reducing RCS by more than 50%. It could be loaded on centerline and inboard wing stations, and can be jettisoned.


Specifications
Crew: 1 or 2
Length: 60.3 ft (18.38 m)
Height: 16 ft (4.88 m)
Wingspan: 44.9 ft (13.68 m) w/ missiles
Wing area: 500 sq ft (46.45 m²)
Weight: 32,764 lb (14,862 kg) empty
Fuel (JP-8):

  • Internal:
    • Single-seater: 14,480 lb (6,568 kg)
    • Two-seater: 13,560 lb (6,150 kg)
  • Conformal: 7,000 lb (3,175 kg)
  • External: 9,590 lb (4,349 kg) with 3× FPU-12/A fuel tanks

Powerplant: 2× F414 EPE

  • Uninstalled maximum thrust: 26,000 lbf (116 kN)

Performances:
(Note: ‘fighter escort configuration’ is 60% internal fuel, 2× AIM-9 Sidewinder, 2× AIM-120 AMRAAM)

  • Design limit speed (fighter escort configuration):
    • @ Sea level: Mach 1.1
    • @ 35,000 ft (10.6 km): Mach 2.0
  • Altitude: 53,000 ft (16,154 m)
  • Angle-of-attack limitations: None (in any symmetric configurations)
  • Pitch rate: in exceed of 50°/s
  • Approach speed: 125 kt (231 km/h)
  • Radar cross section: 1 m² (0 dBsm)

Armaments:

  • Hardpoints: 11 total (2× wingtip, 6× under wing, 3× fuselage) for 17,747 lb (8,050 kg) of ordnances
  • Gun: 1× M61A2 20 mm gun (412 rounds)
  • Weapon pods: 3× EWP
    • 4× AIM-120B/C/D AMRAAM
    • 2× AIM-120 + 2× GBU-38 JDAM/GBU-54 LJDAM
    • 2× AIM-120 + 4× GBU-39 SDB/GBU-53 Stormbreaker
    • GBU-31 JDAM/GBU-64 JDAM-ER
  • Air-to-air missiles:
    • 8× AIM-7P Sparrow
    • 12× AIM-9M/X Sidewinder
    • 12× AIM-120B/C/D AMRAAM
    • 4× AIM-174B
  • Air-to-surface missiles:
    • 6× AGM-65E/F Maverick
    • 4× AGM-84D Harpoon
    • 4× AGM-84E SLAM
    • 4× AGM-84H/K SLAM-ER
    • 6× AGM-88A/B/C HARM
    • 6× AGM-88E AARGM
    • 4× AGM-158C LRASM
    • 18× AGM-179 JAGM
  • Guided bombs:
    • 4× AGM-154A/A-1/C JSOW
    • 7× GBU-12/16 Paveway II
    • 4× GBU-24B Paveway III
    • 4× GBU-31 JDAM
    • 11× GBU-32/38 JDAM
    • 10× GBU-53 Stormbreaker
    • 11× GBU-54 LJDAM
  • Unguided bombs:
    • 11× Mk 20 Rockeye cluster bombs
    • 11× Mk 82/83 general-purpose bombs
    • 4× Mk 84 general-purpose bombs
    • 11× Mk 82 Snakeye high-drag bombs
    • 11× Mk 83 AIR high-drag bombs
    • 11× Mk 84 AIR high-drag bombs

Avionics:

  • Radar: AN/APG-79
  • RWR: AN/ALR-67(V)3
  • Targeting pod: AN/ASQ-228 ATFLIR
  • HMD: JHMCS
  • Night vision device: Vision Systems NVCD

Countermeasures:

  • Chaff/Flare: 4× AN/ALE-47 (120 total)
  • Towed decoy: 3× AN/ALE-50 AAED or AN/ALE-55 FOTD
  • DIRCM: 2× TADIRCM
  • ECM: AN/ALQ-214(V)4 IDECM

Sources
3 Likes

What about the railgun?

+1 for another Hornet.

Should it also be able to use AIM-174s and possibly AIM-260s, since this aircraft laid the groundwork for the Block 3 configuration?

+1 we need a million more hornets

cool addition to the game, but did this post sit on pending for over 6 months?
image

Yes and that’s typical timeframe for people who submit suggestions as forum staff since their submission is different from forum non-staff members’ suggestion submission.