Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion

Game Discussion General Discussion
630

the B3 ARENA is 11.0

631

still Idk about the BN being 11.7

I do think the other challenger 2s should go back to 11.3 (means you dont have to up tier the tornado GR1 to a tier it supposedly cant preform at according to gaijin )

632

the black night at most is a 12.3 tank

633

The B3 arena is also a dogshit platform even compared to the base Chally 2.

Also Arena-E (B3 arena) is considerably worse than Arena-M (90M, B3A) which in turn is worse than iron fist.

634

yes the platform is worse but it still shouldnt fight 10.0 tanks

635

Honestly might be a question for @vizender or @totolescargo

636

I mean it’s just a 10.3 T-72B but with a better dart, gun handlings, thermals and a situational APS.

637

@Piciu713 pls tell the Devs to Release version 2.57.0.19 now, thanks :3

3 Likes
638

IMG_3944
IMG_39441170×1916 575 KB

I don’t see a single vehicle here except maybe the 506 not being able to destroy it

639

I predict content for the 3rd major update (mid 9th month)

  • New ammunition for Leopard 2A7

  • The early light attack aircraft (turbojet engine) around 6.3 ~ 7.0 for USA, Italy, France, UK, Chinese, USSR and Germany to researchable vehicles tech tree

  • 3rd gen & 4th gen targeting pod AN/AAQ-28 Litening for domestic USA and USA allies aircraft rank VII ~ IX

  • EC map 256 km X 256 km (Air realistic & simulator battle) for aircraft late rank VI, and rank VII ~ IX

  • Domestic USN 2nd gen fighter aircraft with AIM-9B for researchable vehicles tech tree (slightly worse event vehicle)

  • Datalink pod for AGM-130, GBU-15 and AGM-62 on F-4E, F-111F/F-111C and F-15E loadout

  • Anti-radiation Missile 60’s ~ 70’s era for USA aircraft rank VII ~ VIII

  • Rework flight model for 1st gen ~ 4th gen infrared Air-to-Air Missile

  • Rework AIM-7 Sparrow, Vympel R-23/R-24 and R-27

640

Hey. The OFL 120 F2 is a DU equivalent to the F1, with the same geometry but using depleted uranium instead of tungsten.
In game, the penetration isn’t better. It’s actually 1mm lower point blank and a few mm better at long range.
The main purpose of the F2 IRL was to significantly improve long range penetration. According to the French National Assembly, at a distance where the OFL 120 F1 would penetrate a t72 from 1500m, the F2 could do it at 2500m. However this information is useless for in game purposes since gaijin only model APFSDS using the Lorenz Odermat (miss spelled k think lol) formula which is an approximation which doesn’t work well for the case of the F2

1 Like
641

i mean thats just a bad argument, the t34-85 can destroy the challenger 2 does that mean it should be an 11.7 tank?

642

Then why should it not fight 10.0? Nothing there struggles to beat it

643

some vehicles do considering it has 3bm60 amazing gun handling good sights etc it should be 11.3 with the mk3 merkavas and stuff

644

Well, now that we have the F-14D, I hope for the A-4M :D

645

im hoping for a non premium F-14D

646

Iirc this is because the 2A7V is missing D-tech armor in the hull. With only C-tech in game, the Leopard 2RIs much thicker AMAP-B armor package makes up for the hull composite difference.

The heavy Revolution armor kit is no joke (2RI vs 2A7V comparison)

image
image

With D-Tech for the 2A7V it would probably make up for the difference again though and be better than the 2RI.

647

WOW!!!

Honestly, this is a HUGE W from Gaijin, giving Top MBTs actually functional stock shells.

Also- Sweden getting DM53… well, now I may play them, even despite the 1st Gen thermals, hahah. 3x Strv 122s with DM53 will be just too good to keep ignoring, even with horrible thermals.

648

And france is still stuck with the worst top tier shell in the game! surely no bias here right?

649

britain* france has a better shell than britain

image
image