Just like a question I thought about before: why doesn’t the automatic loader on the turret affect the steering when it’s destroyed? What’s the basis for this design? There isn’t one, and it doesn’t need one. In reality, no one would know whether the steering can still turn, because the turret would have already flown a kilometer away.
F-15E RMP might be 15.0 (Air battle mode) minimum with AIM-9X (initial)
I predict gajin add early batch production (15.3 minimum) equipment
Imo that is the most ugly one in the trophy lol.
Challenger 3 when ?
Probably next update/the next along with mbts for everyone else
i doubt britain would get a SEPV3 one update and a Challenger 3 the next but hey i wouldnt mind it
when you say buyable you mean premium don’t you?
Its possibly I wouldn’t be surprised if everyone gets a domestic option is what I meant
it would be nice if britain got an ACTUAL Challenger 3 instead of a knockoff CR2
(this challenger 3 for example)
(or this challenger 3 for example which is more likely as the CR3 EPSOM got passed not to long ago)
Spoiler
1: there probably gonna butcher the thing like they done to every other challenger so missing spall liners and as its on a L/55 a 6S reload the engine power will most likely stay the same the armour wont be near realistic etc
2: i feel like the abrams was gaijins way of giving us a good top tier tank without needing to buff the challengers at all
and quick edit: in the case of the EPSOM if it gets added in the way gaijin probably wants
-
It will keep the 31 degree turret traverse even though the challenger 2 even is supposed to be faster
-
It will keep a 6s reload as its on an L/55
-
Gaijin will most likely butcher its ERA performance making it still somehow worse than relikt
-
It will also probably keep the 1314HP as it hasnt been officially stated to be 1500hp yet just they can if needed
-
By the looks of it trophy might be on itt but i cant tell from the photo but iron fist is better either way.
-
it might atleast have blowouts and spall liners
2 Likes
I predict AIM-9X (Initial) to be like R-73 with AIM-9M seeker
You wrote way too much for something tbh I don’t care for lol
1 Like
One thing I got to visualize up close this Tankfest is,
the size diff b/w a Leo 2A4 and 1A5.
Surprisingly both have nearly similar proportions/footprints. 2A4 looks very flat-sort of, especially compared to Chally 2, which is hella tall.
The images online always confused me.
German player moment
Leopards are just cooler 🤷♀️I don’t make the rules
Day 1224 of waiting for Polish tech tree
4 Likes
Now we just need the German mains to learn how to play them
1 Like
Truke
1 Like
That’s never happening tho unfortunately
1 Like
Most bug reports on the pl 12 were shut down as “not a bug” from what ive seen
Despite the missile clearly having issues with the autopilot and the fact that it pulls less than every other modern fox 3
Even in ideal conditions the missile cant pull more than 18 g to this day and still gets out pulled by very low br jets and most top tier jets
Doesnt seems like the devs are monitoring the situation since nothing has really changed since april
Maybe am wrong but i dont think there’s a bug report that has been accepted concerning the maneuverability of the pl 12 ever since the changes or some of them were accepted then denied after investigation
The same could be said about UK players and Challenger 2/3s. Like, sure, they aren’t the best, but the Challengers also aren’t as bad as some players want to say.