Should but you never know.
So uh… What are we waiting for?
Gamba chests / Devblog :3
Oh yeah, can’t really afford those. I’m literally stacking for the 50% sl reductions of october, says a lot about how miserable I am on that matter
What?! what are you playing for then?
For the vehicles. I really don’t have enough spare sl for gamba crates
FV101 devblog next plz plz plz plz
Yea me too, I am so broke that from now I am waiting the October sales to buy multiple vechicles that for now they are simple too expensive
Just need the AV-8A and go fighter mode in NT
I think I’ve made about 6 mil with this NT test in total with the Harrier.
@Smin1080p_WT Can we expect a Vechicle Dev blog today or the new map Dev blog was all the news for today?
Likely will be another blog later today given that this blog was dropped pretty early.
Yeah, the thing is I’m sorta broke so I’m not gonna buy premiums right now. That may change soon though, but we’ll see
Anyway, is NT a good grind spot overall? I’m interested but playing it will cost me a bunch to get a lineup
Let me guess this will turn into a rubbish map in about a year
Oh absolutely, but atleast it will be visually nice.
Another map ruined to be either a fy_iceworld or a fy_pool_day
Edit: We will buy 1 GJN and celebrate the overhaul of map team when sands of Sinai get their top lane reactivated
or sl crates
It’s ok:
- AA needs to be neutered, it shouldn’t be this OP at all, especially the SPAAG’s.
- RP rewards should be increased or atleast the cap should be raised
- SL spawn costs should be halved
- Naval targets need to reward more and maybe respawn
- Needs some permanent markers for some stationary stuff that should be known (like SAM sites)
- Maybe add in some data-link or AWACS similar system using the EW radars
- Maybe add in some new targets to go for, like make use of those bases from the Deep Strike test
Overall though it’s not too bad, just the BR ranges they pick are a bit dull or unbalanced. They could always use the Sim bracket system for this though for some variety.
Okay! Correction to my question: it was the H-band i was thinking of!
So is it possible to suggest that the F-4C, F-111A and Ayit get access to the AGM-45 B-9 with its H-band seeker? I believe it is only the OSA and the CWAR that uses H-band, so it would be nice for those 3 aircraft to have it.
