Kf51 and kf51 evo i could agree.
But i hipe u dont mean the kf51U with a leo 1 turret underneath and mock up on top
Kf51 and kf51 evo i could agree.
But i hipe u dont mean the kf51U with a leo 1 turret underneath and mock up on top
K2NO, leopard 2A5DK and the Strv 123A to Sweden so i can have the funniest lineup ever.
Half of which was bon functioning mock up parts.
The APS was never working on the norway K2s.
Generaly the suggestion moderator responsible for the suggestion did a lot of stuff wrong
Vietnam era is the current focus. Anything further will depend on:
A) The results of that test
B) Feedback
C) Development progress on future NE changes
Lul, says its allready finished
I learned to go left to right, then „Punkt vor strich“ (Multiplications and Dividions first) and then that the results of () and √ and ^ and e^ are to be treated like normal numbers and thus they need to be done before calculating the equation
but I don’t have a Name for the system
The worst part was that I finished writing it😭 I opened it earlier today and typed out all my feedback just now, and now i cant sent it.
Sweden, UK and Japan all fighting for who could have the crazier MBT line-up.
Well it would be a leopard 2a4 deep down probably but irrelevant.
It should be fixed.
Yes, it’s fixed now. My thanks to both you and Stona for taking the time to fix it!
Ok thanks. I’m looking forward to the next playtest.
One more question, were the ARMs that were added yesterday then removed a few hours later (AGM-45B-10, AS 37, and Kh-27PS) intended to be able to be used for the next nuclear thunder playtest? Or was that just accidentally pushed to live and intended for the major update?
i ate the ARMs, was hungry

This only works if you place those better MBTs a full 1.0 BR above everything else.
true
The 2A6 stomped the shit out of top tier for a while, it stomped hard enough that it became one of the only top tier MBTs that had their reload temporarily nerfed purely because it stomped that hard.
It was also the main reason why the T-80BVM was quickly added in.
there are afaik no offical stats on the PL-12 so its more accurate to say the the SD-10A is the PL-12 for all matters (and that is what gaijin thinks to some extent), but anyway there are multiple sources in that bugreport that show that the SD-10A should only have 70km range
Not all of them, standard rules still apply, for example Community Manager Amberlight commented on the Su-47 last month ^^
Similar reasoning behind Object 640 ultimately not being implemented :')