Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

2 Likes

iirc, production ones never got it, the ones that did were experimental

Apparently not the case according to some of those documents

“Heavy armor added to Hull and Turret”.

Gaijin: “ah, but you see, the ‘heavy armor’ from the hull is, uuuh… actually the exact same from the baseline M1 from 1979! They just use that wording because they like the sound of it!”

2 Likes

US does not need a sub tree at all, I would much rather get my domestic options over some copy and paste, please and thank you.

1 Like

I would say, try and call whatever department keeps records of declassified technical info on military vehicles, but we all are aware of the “marketing lie” or ”propaganda” shtick by now.

2 Likes

This is quite the waste, this mode could have ben such a cool thing.

since these changes are very unlikely they could start with reducing the amount of players to 4 per session wich would help a lot.

I am pretty sure the minimum amount of players per match already is 4, but the matchmaker will try to create a bigger match for a while before starting a 4 player one

Gaijin has mastered the art of rejecting any report they want.

It’s just a bingo between: “not enough info”, “too much info” or “false info”.

5 Likes

Its just funny that the most modern US Abrams with “DU” armor in WT has the exact armor stats as the M1A2T thats supposed to have composite armor only

Oh, M1A1T’s package is a last-gen package meant to provide equivalent levels of protection… which is underperforming too.

M1A2 SEP, SEPv2 and T all have underperforming turret armor. It should be improved over A1HC/A2, yet it is not.

1 Like

Pretty sure he got banned because he made the exact same report 5 separate times ¯_(ツ)_/¯

1 Like

Weird though because ive seen that happen quite a few times before and never seen a ban

Fellas, has the years’ first big event vehicle leaked?
or any solid predications made?

nothing from what I know

1 Like

If its a plane, chances are that its a strategic bomber

Or the dreaded
caption

11 Likes

We need a complete rework of Russian ERA
Tandem warheads not defeating ERA
Top attack missiles like SPIKE not locking, not tracking and doing no damage “Hit”

2 Likes

not of all Russian ERA

the Kontakt 1 is fine

the rest needs a Reality check, and yes Tandem warheads need to defeat ERA

4 Likes

The US doesn’t need Turkiye. Since the US still has plenty of Domestic planes, tanks, boats and helicopters options left across all br’s.

Italy on the other hand - Hungary has been left for dead, same can be said about Romania. Perhaps it was planned this way for the addition of Turkiye.
Not only that, Italy and Turkiye have a very strong Defense and Strategic allience, since both are key players in the Euro-Mediterranean region.
Also deepening collaboration in defense, including partnerships between Baykar (Turkey) and Leonardo (Italy) on drones, and discussions on Eurofighter jets.

2 Likes