its will keep up, these stupidly fast shitbox will be spaming meteor at hight alt and run away.
i swear if we get long bvr missile i would just play j10c to fill my revenge on them for being op over years
2 Likes
Gaijin: Retaliation? They will force a balance on PL-15.
+disable the ability to use only one gun at a time + allow Ammo belt explosion to kill crew
Here are some quick clips I made…the trajectory of the R73 in these clips “IF” the seeker is Shrinking from 4.25 degrees down to 0.75 if memory servs…shots like these should be 10000000% kills! 110% after burn NO Pre Flare. The R73 and 9M IRCCM did not preform this bad in the past with these kind of shots! My theory is they get tuned down at some point when the next big thing is around the corner. I know people learned how to counter these missiles…NOT what I’m getting at though, Pre Flare used to be the golden rule for the FOV type IRCCM it very much seems like this has been adjusted in some way compared to a year after the R73 was added!
1 Like
I think it do need some more watch.
current situation is not normal, too many experienced players bullying rookies.
I tried to leave the troop and go side area of the map along, and the experience changed to basically a T series with IFV fire power. though I’m not a very good player, but I can feel it’s not such overpowered if without current environment.
rookies are not experienced enough to dealing with T-90M level protection. they easily get panic so shoot without targeting. I got shot in UPF so many times that I won’t encounter when play in same br in old time.
the environment need to be changed, though it’s not so easy, the easily way is mixed matching, but it will interfere data.
I think this is the issue with 90% of complaints about Russian MBTs. Somewhere between 7.0 and 10.0 people forget how to aim for weakspots. There’s also a ton of popular lightly armoured NATO tanks around 10.7.
For the BMPT specifically, put the premium one at 11.0 because of it’s considerably worse survivability, and put the TT one at 11.7/12.0 with the ATGMs from the BMP-2M if it can use them. And make their “external” ammo kill the crew because it’s very clearly inside of the tank.
basically IFV and light tanks, they are week against BMPT, but I think MBT not.
sadly no
maybe remake the cut, the truly external part burn the turret, and internal part explode.
1 Like
Agreed. We should get heli PVE and ground assult to have more BRs above 8.3 (assult) and 9.7 (heli). This is ridiculous that I am trying to take out targets with a 4km SACLOS against a field of FnFs.
2 Likes
Yeah IRCCM missiles feel super weird currently. I have had PL8Bs and AAM-3s get 1 flared rear aspect.
Magic 2 is also just inconsistent. It will either say “screw you in particular” and ignore 20 flares to kill the plane or it gets flared by a single flare.
5 Likes
Its a top tier tank at 10.7. It needs to be 12.7. It entered service in the 2010’s and is “top of the line” in the russian army. The Leo 2a4 entered service in the 80’s, it shouldnt be fighting tanks with no armor that are 30 years older than it.
It dropped two flares/chaff and at that exact moment the AIM-9M veered off if you look closely (at 0:05 you can see the small dots in sensor view). Ironically the AIM-9M veers off while the sensor cone stays on the target, so there’s a discrepancy what the missile looks at and what it follows (or sensor view is telling lies).
1 Like
I’ve been wondering honestly, are SPIKE NLOS even planned for Israeli Helicopters? considering we got more new OP F&F missiles.
funny enough this reminds me of back just before IRCCM missiles were added, 9Ls used to be super flair resistant but then near to the release of the 9M and R73 it became comically easy
5 Likes
Okay, so put all the low tier stuff which is in the WW II bracket but more modern, than also higher than BR 7.7
Gaijin opinion on LOAL for AT missiles is rather negative to say the least. Unless their opinion on this subject changes, i.e. they add more counterplay in the form of APS and the like dont expect the NLOS to come any time soon.
Considering that the NLOS is substantially slower than the ER I wouldn’t consider it to be a direct upgrade even if it has longer range.
same with R-60 and AiM-9J
and then again with R-60M
Did they test fly them or was it just something they said they were interested in?
Just an interest so far. The closest they came to actually “testing” it was just from attending airshows
As for actually buying it it’s up in the air. There isn’t really anything more final than just the info they were considering Su-57E, KF-21, Rafale and others for their next fighter. Personally I’m even leaning towards KF-21 being more likely, but that’s really just a guess.
1 Like
Even SPIKE ER2s which would require minimal changes just double the range and a better booster
Sounds good to me! Of course this would have to apply to all vehicles so i never want to see another atgm when I play a ww2 vehicle