Hello @Smin1080p_WT
I have a question I’m curious about, there’s been some talks about next-gen missiles coming this year potentially.
What is currently planned to come first, next-gen IR missiles or next-gen radar missiles?
things like F-35 are a given to come within the next year or so. just like leopard 2a8 and m1e3 abrams will almost certainly appear soon
I do think passed to devs should be more for the obscure stuff.
1 Like
That’s not the case at all. We have the CM disclosures news updates regularly and I and my collueges are here answering things in this very topic and others daily.
Literally just having answered your original question about why was X passed and the reasons behind that. So its not clear at all what they are referring too.
1 Like
Any news on the significant development of weapon technology in game would be saved for a more official post like a CM disclosures or dev blog. Not a post here.
some one said F14D where???
How does it matter who made it?
The point is both weren’t intended as prototypes for future service aircraft, but instead as testbeds for current/future research. The “provisions for armament” cited on the Su-47, like provisions for hardpoints, were on the EAP as well. But neither of them was actually armed.
Now if there was intended armed versions, like the Yak-141, they’d be unfinished prototypes and it’d make sense. But so long as that isn’t the case they are unfortunately both just unarmed demonstrators.
5 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT if i may ask, is there any news on the next CM disclosures soon at all? just wondering
As we are only just a few weeks after the last major and the holidays still ongoing, we are a way off currently.
1 Like
with the next major update only dropping in several months (usually march or April) we expect Gaijin to be on the rest phase of the year which would make it more likely that theres not going to be a lot coming until then
i just hope, if it comes to it, gajins gonna do the sensible thing and add it to both nations.
Its history of being developed for germany in the competition as the next main caliber cannon in the mgcs, together with it being developed/ produced/ tested in germany and never having set foot on british soil. Would read very weirdly in a british only Devblog.
The LAV-25 is borderline a poster child for the USMC. I’m confused on how you guys determine what is in demand or “iconic” because we have yet to get things like the TOW HMMWV, or LAV-25, which are easily some of the most identifiable vehicles ever.
A lot of different ways on many platforms and mediums. Its not just the forum, but the community as a whole. We follow discussions, videos and topics everywhere :)
sadly dev blogs cant realy be trusted at this point anymore either
I don’t think you guys read the Japanese WWII community.
Cough, cough, it’s been five years after the latest WWII TT plane… cough, cough
2 Likes
everywhere?
@Smin1080p_WT Sorry to bother you but I’m just wondering why do suggestions get locked after being passed to the devs? Wouldn’t it make sense for them to stay open so that people can continue to vote and talk about them without needing to create new threads for them?
2 Likes
Dev Blogs are an overview of a vehicle still in development. We are very clear about the information within them:
Please note that vehicle characteristics are still in development and may change before release.
Quite what that has to do regarding my answer with major announcements however I’m not sure.
yes and no
some statements seem empty when they turn 2 years old
Do you guys only add things based on popularity then? Like I said already, TOW HMMWV, and the LAV-25, are easily some of the most identifiable and iconic vehicles of the US military, why have these yet to be seen in game?
We have a few reasons for this. Typically the most popular suggestion topics could go on and on and round and round in circles for a very long time. At some stage, suggestions could be open too long to the point where it draws off topic, needless back and forth or other factors not required for any form of meaningful discussion. Leaving everything open will also keep attention on already passed topics and less views, traffic and interest on other newer or more niche topics. So its also to allow a constant healthy flow of suggestions through.
Passing is a form of archiving and preserving too. So once its passed, the topic is cleaned up to make it as clear as possible and documented in the appropriate area.
If people want to simply discuss a vehicle, that’s what the general forum sections are for.
1 Like