Or decompression… especially in the 5.0-6.0 range…
Navals in a super weird spot though, cuz we need AT LEAST 1 more br total but we get into the weird cas bracket again
2 Likes
its just so sad that it kinda seems like they dont care, just push new prems out and move on
4 Likes
Like I love this game to death more then most and ill likely keep playing forever but the state its in now is just horrendous its the worst its ever been and only getting worse
1 Like
its just money money money
2 Likes
Maybe twin seat Eurofighter for Italy, the one which was tested with many different stuff, including ECRS MK-0.
I think this one would be the best choise, especially since they’ve already added “AESA Typhoon” in the regular tree.
Other options would be less interesting, either Romanian F-16AM (engine like on C, better missiles), but please leave some Romanian planes for the regular tree or Hungarian Gripen with IRIS-T and Meteors. Actually both of these planes are kinda rank 9 material, if implemented at full potential.
Thats some cope to call hand held given they haven’t had a top tier SPAA or Jet the entire year lmao or the majority of years where they lack a top tier jet, hell even now they dont but its more so vause of compression.
Also you say the most Leeway? What are you on? At least they trialed the vehicle Japan literally got some fictional vehicle lmao. Talk about not knowing what you’re talking about
Get out of here with this clown cope lmao
2 Likes
So infantry won’t cause any decrease of the amount of new vehicles added each update?
Would be nice if it’s true.
1 Like
Big rant lol kinda
Spoiler
I had forgotten after not playing Swedish tanks a while how rough they are… no Laser rangefinder till T4 at top tier, the CV90s still lacking optical tracking the SPAA compared to other trees, CAS still a problem for the most part in comparisoj to most trees… its rough man and the fact the subtreea were all useless additions basically
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
I will say: I’ve been playing WoT as an alternative to War Thunder, and it’s been a bad experience. The pay to win is so bad, the match maker is bad, and grind is bad. Somehow though, WoT has more unique project vehicles (that were actually real) than War Thunder does, in the tech tree as well. I literally can get the Sturmtiger for free. War Thunder could blow out the competition, but they choose to blow out our pockets instead.
I had forgot about that, isnt its reload supposed to be 4 sec too?
It has no impact on air, ground or naval vehicle development.
1 Like
Idk between the models but last Smin said the devs were still looking over their mistake
1 Like
Still waiting on my low tier hungarian aircraft
3 Likes
Feel like the community pointed out their mistakes pretty damn good for them, what exactly do they have to look at?
1 Like
Idk ask the devs, personally they dont look anything alike but guess its hard to admit they nerfed it without using their eyes and dont wanna admit they are wrong
2 Likes
To clarify one developer in the comments of a dev blog said Sweden was their favourite in game nation to play.
Every single dev, CM and staff member has a favourite vehicle or favourite nation. Please don’t confuse one persons personal preference and opinion with some sort of nation bias.
6 Likes
While I agree with what you say things like the BMPT and Su-30SM2 make that hard to believe sometimes :/
7 Likes
Insert me laughing at current events : P
1 Like
The TT i dont play cause i dont play WT. I got to 2A4 in that tree yeah. Otherwise i have entire german,chinese,russian and US tree. I play with people who have the entire tree and they all agree Sweden is best tree and much better than any other. The Gripen E is best CAS on top tier atm, Strv 122s are best Leos ig. And we can continue.