An emergency 11.3 addition to give the BMPT a more well rounded lineup at its new BR
I would choose T-80BV(1985) as better choice
this is a so boring vehicle that I almost give up grinding it.
but I will, as a hamster
Mate, even if I was interested in the tank, Gaijin wouldn’t be able to tell that I am playing the game because of the event
Unless people stop playing GRB for the entirety of the event there is no way to make Gaijin think that they aren’t interested in this vehicle
The only way we can make Gaijin aware of our displeasement is by complaining on the Forums
Thankfully, I can totally ignore it. I dont bother grinding anything im not actually going to use and I can barely be bothered to grind the vehicle, let alone the trade token. But still annoying that the soviets have gotten the last naval event, and technically the last air event and now the ground event.
It would be nice if the distribution of events was a LOT more even. At a minimum, I think a nation should be excluded from being legible for an event if they’d had one in the past 3-6 months already (of any type)
Force gaijin to add more event vehicles to the nations that dont get them as often
Oh Sorry 2 out 3 of those MBTs are mediocre, meanwhile china gets an underbaked aircraft that was overdue for years, don’t even get me started on Just the top tier vehicles that should have come ages ago at this point, oh well
Surely china gets handheld kekw
Which got more addition in 2025 ?
They could have added literal copy paste slop to any of the six nations that weren’t represented in the winter event and there would have been no complaints
That never stated USSR tree specifically though, it only talks about tech tree gaps in general.
3 Likes
Yep, totally agree.
Especially a nation like Israel that got kinda shafted in the last major update and I dont think has ever gotten a ground event vehicle
1 Like
“Filling gaps in existing trees”
What gaps does the USSR tree have that need to be filled?
5 Likes
They didnt because of people like you who a dev says soviet think its baised
Are you talking now or in the start or 2025 ?
2 different thing
Either?
The USSR has one of, if not the most complete trees in the game
2 Likes
If they specifically said “filling gaps in the USSR tree” rather than “filling gaps in the existing trees”, would that not be biased?
So much for new types of vehicles, US still doesn’t have a wheeled IFV or missile carrier in its tech tree. Hell, the US hasn’t gotten an IFV in its TT in 5 years.
I have never said anything about devs being biased, I’m just asking for sources and now I’m calling you out for making stuff up.
This really is some “it came to me in a dream” level shit.
4 Likes
It’s all that this guy can come up with when he tries to counter our complaints
China has so vehicles left to add, It should be treated as a Major nation in terms of additions.
Where did I say they have to be the best ?
I highly doubt this without prove and naming said aircraft
To my knowledge no other nations last year barring Japan has got a top tier MBT and even then that unique MBT didn’t last long due to the Chinese getting it for some reason and let’s not forget Gaijin not adding the Thai VT-4 due to it being the wrong time
1 Like
Chinese heavy industry o no I dropped a new vehicle at the air show! Silly old me!
1 Like