Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

That would be a good way to make it an 11.0 vehicle, which tbh wouldn’t be a bad thing.

1 Like

Oh sorry if I have a stronger memory, I’ve see that China got two mbt’s and one that not even in service last year while other nations hardly got any at all.

An emergency 11.3 addition to give the BMPT a more well rounded lineup at its new BR

I would choose T-80BV(1985) as better choice
this is a so boring vehicle that I almost give up grinding it.
but I will, as a hamster

Mate, even if I was interested in the tank, Gaijin wouldn’t be able to tell that I am playing the game because of the event

Unless people stop playing GRB for the entirety of the event there is no way to make Gaijin think that they aren’t interested in this vehicle

The only way we can make Gaijin aware of our displeasement is by complaining on the Forums

Thankfully, I can totally ignore it. I dont bother grinding anything im not actually going to use and I can barely be bothered to grind the vehicle, let alone the trade token. But still annoying that the soviets have gotten the last naval event, and technically the last air event and now the ground event.

It would be nice if the distribution of events was a LOT more even. At a minimum, I think a nation should be excluded from being legible for an event if they’d had one in the past 3-6 months already (of any type)

Force gaijin to add more event vehicles to the nations that dont get them as often

Oh Sorry 2 out 3 of those MBTs are mediocre, meanwhile china gets an underbaked aircraft that was overdue for years, don’t even get me started on Just the top tier vehicles that should have come ages ago at this point, oh well

Surely china gets handheld kekw

Which got more addition in 2025 ?

They could have added literal copy paste slop to any of the six nations that weren’t represented in the winter event and there would have been no complaints

That never stated USSR tree specifically though, it only talks about tech tree gaps in general.

3 Likes

Yep, totally agree.

Especially a nation like Israel that got kinda shafted in the last major update and I dont think has ever gotten a ground event vehicle

1 Like

“Filling gaps in existing trees”

What gaps does the USSR tree have that need to be filled?

5 Likes

They didnt because of people like you who a dev says soviet think its baised

Are you talking now or in the start or 2025 ?

2 different thing

Either?

The USSR has one of, if not the most complete trees in the game

2 Likes

If they specifically said “filling gaps in the USSR tree” rather than “filling gaps in the existing trees”, would that not be biased?

So much for new types of vehicles, US still doesn’t have a wheeled IFV or missile carrier in its tech tree. Hell, the US hasn’t gotten an IFV in its TT in 5 years.

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

4 Likes

It’s all that this guy can come up with when he tries to counter our complaints

China has so vehicles left to add, It should be treated as a Major nation in terms of additions.