Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion

[racimazzedine]

Typical Americans

[KhorneFlakez1337]

I’m not interested in the B-52, but there are plenty of other strategic bombers that I would love to see and according to the Q&A, Gaijin is working on adding strategic bombers

[KhorneFlakez1337]

No, the resources required to work on such things are being spent on infantry

[KhorneFlakez1337]

Canvas roofs are OP, just look at the Avenger

[NoahHuls]

the same “up to” logic has been applied for the swedish CV90 Mk4 in the game, it also still boasts a 234 max ammo count which gives it 2 belts of 80 rounds and 1 of 74 rounds instead of 400 rounds of the cv9030 that gets 5 full belts

@Smin1080p_WT

this lack of any type of critical thinking is very dissapointing

[KhorneFlakez1337]

@CokeSpray

USSR

Sukhoi Su-47

@CokeSpray

Germany

Challenger 130 mm Gun Demonstrator

I’m gonna…

How do I put it without getting the post removed? I don’t think I can pick acceptable words right now…

I’ll leave it at “I’m gonna”

[Balta779517-live]

[joshje100]

Would be cool but unplayable in the current modes. Same with stuff like the B-1, B-2, Vulcan, Victor, Valiant etc would be great to see but pretty much useless.

[joshje100]

Yeah but as collector items meaning they’re going to be like the WW1 tanks and the F-117, cool but crap.

[KhorneFlakez1337]

Some of them would be pretty good in GRB and have potential to be good SL grinders, but yeah, they won’'t be good for actual ARB gameplay

[racimazzedine]

[KhorneFlakez1337]

Cite Your Sources

[joshje100]

Thanks, was actually looking for some of these.

[KhorneFlakez1337]

Gaijin really refused to add the F-111K Merlin, but somehow the Su-47 is fine

[Smin1080p_WT]

@AspectOfTheRAGE

Hello, I’d like to point out that this is not true.
Even the first version of the CV90120 (1998+), with a combat weight of ± 25t was specified to feature 4 crew-members (Commander, Gunner, Loader, Driver).

Hey. It is true according to the very source originally

used in the report to change the weight:

Hence the conflict. As mentioned yesterday, additional reports with new / additional information are more than welcome.

@AspectOfTheRAGE

Not to sound nitpicky here but if QA/Tech Mods can tell me that “up to” doesnt automatically mean “is” then I think I can make my point here.

This was not decided by the QA/Tech Mod teams, but this was the decision taken by the developers.

[BACKRAGE44428-live]

what reasoning did they allow the SU47 in even though it supposedly never had arms

[Motherhen357-psn]

@KhorneFlakez1337

but somehow the Su-47 is fine

It 's not:

@Smin1080p_WT

@dotSHINI

So where would you put the Su 47.

This is just a player made suggestion. Like all of them, it doesn’t mean the vehicle would come to the game.

Currently we have no plans to speak of for this vehicle.

[MAUSWAFFE]

@Rowiek

Yak-141, SU-47 but no EAP

Yak-141 is an unfinished prototype, meaning that while the Yak-141 prototype was incomplete (in this case unarmed), it is added zhe way a finished Yak-141 was intended to be.

Su-47 and EAP aren’t prototypes of a combat aircraft, but standalone demonstrators. So in this sense they are complete, just not armed, meaning they couldn’t be added.

Or at least that was the exanation before the Su-47 got “guessed”

[Smin1080p_WT]

@KhorneFlakez1337

Gaijin really refused to add the F-111K Merlin, but somehow the Su-47 is fine

We didn’t refuse any suggestion for the F-111K at all: General Dynamics F-111K Merlin: The Vark goes British

Something being suggested however does not mean it will be added.

[BACKRAGE44428-live]

does this mean stol MTD is on table ?

i guarntee you in a 1 on 1 this will not loose against the SU-47