As I say we’ve joked about the EAP for months and months and got repeatedly told NO due to the lack of armement so we turned it into a meme, if the dev’s seriously thinking of adding the Su-47 then I’m sorry the EAP and other must come all in one update if Russia is the first to get 5th gen AND a unarmed demonstrator then muck will hit the fan.
4 Likes
And it’s also ridiculous considering we still got no new Fulcrum despite all the options. Russia doesn’t need an unarmed jet
1 Like
Welcome to the club.
Leopard 2 DM rework innthe near future.
2years ago and counting
Alright peeps what subnations (not in game yet as a confirmed tree) should go to what countries?
Curent subtree and their main nation
US- (CAN sorta)
Russia-
Germany- Swiss (CAN sorta)
Britain- South Africa, India (AU and CAN sorta)
Japan- Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia
Italy- Hungary, Romania
France- Belgium, Luxembourg, Netherlands
Isreal-
China- Pakistan
Sweden- Finland, Norway
Current nations in game but no confirmed home nation: Vietnam, Iran, Slovakia, North Korea, Brazil, Turkey, Philippines, Argentina, Cuba, Syria, Poland, Bangladesh, Portugal, Austria, New Zealand, Australia
Leo 2A5 has a weird Turret basket compared to other Leos rn maybe something to come?
Nice
Seeing the A-150 get passed is a bit jank too. Seeing as it breaks the unwritten rule that naval additions were at least laid down. Not to mention the 4 F-35’s
1 Like
Very happy to see this get passed.
Would be a nice addition for sim.
1 Like
Yeah just seeing the air side just filled with F-35’s just gives it away on what they’re doing really.
Getting rid of those suggestions now because they are going to be added soon
1 Like
Eh, passed to devs means very little in my experience so I’m not too bothered. But this one just looked particularly jank to me.
If we are getting the Su-47 then it should let us get other tech demonstrators like the EAP and F-15E1 (the SE tech demonstrator) since those are much closer in the current rules of being added to the game.
3 Likes
It is a lot more.
Armor holes, wrongly modelled armoe etc for all variants
Smin1080p after another mention of the EAP:
1 Like
There’s been talk of it since the Su-47 “guess” for this year. And it’s completely warranted.
3 Likes
I was juat pointing out its a bit different and probably not suppose to be here. Again maybe a hint thag they are lloking at it maybe not
Nothing personal against you, but I always find it funny that it’s just the russian “paper” BB’s people complain about.
Stalingrad especially is so bad at 7.7 it’s barely even worth mentioning.
I would love a Polish tech tree. Put that in a future update please
2 Likes
Finally, passed to devs suggestions, it probably means pending suggestions will be reviewed soon as well, I still have one pending since November.
We had a load approved 2 days ago actually. But nearly all of them were for minesweepers.
But yeah hoping we get some more approved soon. I’ve still got 4 pending, 1 from October, 1 from November, and 2 from early December.
1 Like