Man I tell you when I was doing 9.3 a few years ago only having the SK60 was rough man
1 Like
Might as well ask since you’re here, so when will the devs fix the CV90120 given they used the 2006 model documents to nerf a 2002 model because a vehicle with no add on armor and remote control weapon looks identical to the one with those features
Clearly the add on armor weighs nothing since the crew compartment is filled with lead right?
1 Like
Hopefully the PL-01 wont get this treatment
Well i don’t think we need to worry about the PL-01 lol
1 Like
Well I only say that since its based on the CV90-120 lol
Mr. @Smin1080p_WT , when will the Japanese CAS between 2.0 and 7.7 be replenished? That’s a huge space without any ground support aircraft. I could easily think of over 40 aircraft that could be added there.
7 Likes
Its also made out of wood and didn’t exist past being mounted on a cv90 chassis as a wooden mockup of what it would look like
Though gaijin might think the wood came from sweden so maybe 80t per 3m of wood
1 Like
Lol, lost Gaijin at that part. They’ll get around to it when they run out of modern tech (modern tech will be dragged out for a couple years, buckle up).
I have sadding new for you… For as cool as it looks, it wasn’t made, or last I checked, it wasn’t
If I recall, even the drivable version(which I think was just made to look like it) couldn’t even be added, as I don’t think they kept a working turret.
1 Like
Better question how do i get gaijin to give me more Chi Ha LG i need a entire lineup of them
2 Likes
Well that sucks I really wanted the Khanjali in WT lmao
Guess theres WoT which could add it lmao
1 Like
More Chi-Ha LG? I know there was a Chi-Ha with a short 20cm gun, but I haven’t heard of any others.
3 Likes
You already know the answer, as you have asked before.
If there is a report up, then it depends on the conclusion of that report.
Hey ill take any excuse for gaijin to add more even a ghillie version as a prem would have me shoving money into the snail
2 Likes
The report has been accepted for months the report went through right after the changes were wrongly made. Why does it take months to looks at
Maybe it was a clear marketing lie which is why its taken so long
6 Likes
Not the first time a change has been made using incorrect information and the report to fix what was changed with actually correct information taking years to even be looked at
1 Like
Because there is conflicting information from multiple primary sources. So changes are not going to be made again unless it can be confidently confirmed this time.
1 Like
There literally are none unless you dont have eyes we have brochures that show the 2002 model and show its stats and they fit with the original stats while the 2006 model fits with a completely different model how did the devs screw this up so badly unless they simply wanted to nerf it.
@AspectOfTheRAGE you did the majority of reports and the info provided is pretty clear do you have any idea how someone could misinterpret them without idk using their eyes to read?
2 Likes
There seem to be so many MiG-25 players around, yet I never get downtiers when using the F.3 :(
As for 11.0/11.3 planes to use against MiG-25s, the F-4E (or EJ in my case) definitely works well against them. However, when one gets away, the pain begins.
There is no point in chasing them, as they will outrun you no matter what plane you are flying. You really have to engage them frontally unless they are at very low altitudes.
I feel like Gaijin made a big mistake when they nerfed the ticket drain caused by base and AI target destruction and the MiG-25 situation is a great example to highlight the issue that these nerfs created.
Outside of that issue, the MiG-25 seems pretty balanced (I feel like it could go up to 11.3 though)
Gaijin really gotta figure that ticket drain issue out though