We are passing on feedback on it.
Major updates typically contain over 1000+ fixes. Thats not counting those inbetween in minor updates and QoL updates.
Sadly this is not a realistic or viable suggestion. As the CBR also contains many things that are suggestions and not bugs. Not to mention that is simply impractical and unrealistic to expect every single open report to all be fixed at once.
These things are not related. So again, infantry has nothing to do with the things you mentioned. Its a separate development from any of those subjects.
Feel like bug reports that have been open for a year+, or are genuinely holding a vehicle back should be prioritized.
2 Likes
Its pretty wild that theres passed reports that are years old ngl
I didnt even know about the Ariete one until today let alone the actual amount of armor it was missing
2 Likes
It’s crazy to me how they will release a new vehicle in an update in an incomplete state. How have we as a community just accepted them releasing vehicles with bug reports from the dev server, still open after release in an update?
6 Likes
I’m sorry for asking multiple times Smin, but is there any plan for naval sub tree or squadron naval vehicles in 2026?
1 Like
“Accepted as a suggestion” - insert printer and shredder meme.
8 Likes
Or decompression… especially in the 5.0-6.0 range…
Navals in a super weird spot though, cuz we need AT LEAST 1 more br total but we get into the weird cas bracket again
2 Likes
its just so sad that it kinda seems like they dont care, just push new prems out and move on
4 Likes
Like I love this game to death more then most and ill likely keep playing forever but the state its in now is just horrendous its the worst its ever been and only getting worse
1 Like
its just money money money
2 Likes
Maybe twin seat Eurofighter for Italy, the one which was tested with many different stuff, including ECRS MK-0.
I think this one would be the best choise, especially since they’ve already added “AESA Typhoon” in the regular tree.
Other options would be less interesting, either Romanian F-16AM (engine like on C, better missiles), but please leave some Romanian planes for the regular tree or Hungarian Gripen with IRIS-T and Meteors. Actually both of these planes are kinda rank 9 material, if implemented at full potential.
Thats some cope to call hand held given they haven’t had a top tier SPAA or Jet the entire year lmao or the majority of years where they lack a top tier jet, hell even now they dont but its more so vause of compression.
Also you say the most Leeway? What are you on? At least they trialed the vehicle Japan literally got some fictional vehicle lmao. Talk about not knowing what you’re talking about
Get out of here with this clown cope lmao
2 Likes
So infantry won’t cause any decrease of the amount of new vehicles added each update?
Would be nice if it’s true.
1 Like
Big rant lol kinda
Spoiler
I had forgotten after not playing Swedish tanks a while how rough they are… no Laser rangefinder till T4 at top tier, the CV90s still lacking optical tracking the SPAA compared to other trees, CAS still a problem for the most part in comparisoj to most trees… its rough man and the fact the subtreea were all useless additions basically
1 Like
I will say: I’ve been playing WoT as an alternative to War Thunder, and it’s been a bad experience. The pay to win is so bad, the match maker is bad, and grind is bad. Somehow though, WoT has more unique project vehicles (that were actually real) than War Thunder does, in the tech tree as well. I literally can get the Sturmtiger for free. War Thunder could blow out the competition, but they choose to blow out our pockets instead.
I had forgot about that, isnt its reload supposed to be 4 sec too?
It has no impact on air, ground or naval vehicle development.
1 Like
Idk between the models but last Smin said the devs were still looking over their mistake
1 Like