Mushashis armor layout should be basicly the same but i recall that her cittadel armor and some other parts very slightly less thick then on the Yamato but that diffrence is just around 20mm.
the reason for SPEAR 3 being denied is due to range not MMV as it can be used purely in GNSS so the complaints have been that SPEAR 3 was denied because it can cap out at 140km while KH59ME is 200km
A MiG-29 would be better for a premium option. Either 9.13 or 29M 9.15
Basic Su-30 was also on my list
In terms of Su-37, I think Gaijin owe us a weird Sukhoi in the tech tree because of the current gap in the naval line. Not that Su-37 is a naval vehicle, but we are one vehicle short in the tree
in fact it seems to me that putting only the Littorio in the TT seems like a blow to me that’s why I asked how reliable it is I hope for something like B2 Centauro, OF-40 Spaa, Palmira prototype or SP-70 (England, Germany, Italy), M44 Hungarian tas.
1 Like
Any data on the expected French frigate’s armament? Do we have any SAP rounds for it or the vehicle is going to be a 4.0 Ayanami wannabe?
yeah a good few people dont seem happy hopefully this isnt all thats comming and its like at most 2 thirds of it
2 Likes
this single image speaks about the state of GRB right now. good night people.
10 Likes
gonna get worse with a buff across the board for russian tanks and if the KH59 is real
1 Like
more wood to the fire thats what is going to bring that.
I heard about auto loader buffs for chn/ru .
Someone explain it to me alkhalid and vt-4 both have SSAL(solid state autoloader ) as per the pakistani manufacturer and licenced producer HIT , so shouldnt they be a little faster at reloading than older T-80s AND T-72s ?
According to the diagrams I looked at, they’re absolutely identical. The only changes are in the Shinano and No. 111.
More than all other nations combined lmao
truly balanced
1 Like
at least the only real differences between the three are the AA batteries, which arent all that relevant in my experience anyway
if anybody that is having issues with the ship’s in the leek list :
Project 48 Destroyer Leader type , Erevan (some time's called Yerevan)
Project 48 Destroyer Leader, Kiev - Lost Leader
https://war-book.ru/lidery-eskadrennyh-minonostsev-proekta-48/
Luigi Cadorna already was in the BP devblog
escorteur de Classe Élan "Commandant Dominé (A15 =} U70 =} F742)"
* COMMANDANT DOMINÉ (1940/1960)
Élan-class sloop - Wikipedia
Richelieu class , Jean Bart (1940 fit , pic 1/2/3 , or 1953 to end of life refit , pic 4/5/6 , not specified)
1940 fit
1953 to end of life refit
Crew
911 men in 1950 (incomplete)
1,280 during the Suez operations
2,220 planned in wartime
Technical characteristics
Length : 248 m
Beam : 35,5 m
Draft : 9,60 m
Displacement : 42 806 t
46 500 t (normal)
48,950 t (full load)
Propulsion : 6 Sural boilers
4 Parsons turbines - 4 propellers
Power : 155 000 ch
Speed : 32 knots (59 km/h)
Military characteristics
Armor ; Belt: 330 mm
Upper armored deck: 150 mm
Lower armored deck: 40 mm
Turrets: 430 mm
log cabin: 340 mm
Armament
2 quadruple 380 mm turrets forward
3 triple 152 mm turrets aft
In 1949
8 single 40 mm mounts Bofors Mk 1/2 AA
20 single 20 mm Oerlikon Mk 4 AA mounts
In 1953
12 twin 100 mm AA turrets
14 twin 57mm AA turrets licensed by Bofors
Electronics
electromagnetic detection means
Range
7,671 miles at 20 knots 3,181 miles at 30 knots
Le Brestois , 3 option's
- Adroit-class destroyer “Le Brestois” (1928/1942) (Pennant number: 12, 97, 14, 31, 51, T51)
* BRESTOIS (1928/1942)
French destroyer Brestois - Wikiwand
- Escorteur rapide type E50 “Le Brestois (F762)” , pre-retrofit
Escorteur rapide Le Brestois — Wiki-Brest
Caractéristiques
- Escorteur rapide type E50 “Le Brestois (F762)” , post-retrofit
same link has above for info
JESUS THAT TOOK WAY TO LONG AHAH
21 Likes
I expect trailer Thursday and dev server Friday
Ad populum fallacy.
Popularity doesn’t indicate anything other than personal preference.
Kh-59ME will be significantly worse than FAB-3000, GROMs, and Kh-38s for ground RB.
Kh-59ME is even worse than Kh-29 which itself is chronically bad for anything higher than 10.7 GRB.
4 - 6km lock range against targets is not good.
I mean some of these could still happen, the leak list usually doesn’t cover the entire update.
However I also wouldn’t have too high expectations for these “suprise vehicles”, as we don’t know if and what they are.
1 Like
yea truly balanced and later we got told that they are in doubt of adding an IR missile that just 2 nations could have the nations in question (israel and japan)
Clearly those 2 nations are oppressive in game…
…the lack of sound their remarkable absence make, quite a horror movie scene if you ask me.
Spoiler
Sorry i’m on team sarcasm tonight
The EBRC Jaguar effect i guess
2 Likes
yea yea ad populum fallacy sure alvis, MI-28NMs and Flankers slinging LMURs and KH-38s + russian W button enjoyers + spawn camping wiping entire nato teams from the map its ad populum fallacy. tell us another joke maybe we can laugh better at you and not with you.