That is a massive assumption it would even be 10.3-10.7 lol.
Looking at the planes around it that would be a massive stretch for ground RB, let alone air RB.
It would sit between the F-4C and F-4E?
It aint coming. People are reading into this april 1st joke a lot. December update is either F-16V or MiG-35 or new nation. And in november, not much will be coming as they have around 6 weeks to drop it
These leaks between platforms are usual. It is for a new game or a new enlisted 2.0 or is something just walking around with WT title in Gaijin servers before being sent somewhere else
Yes, but I prefer F-4E/Late instead of any south korean vehicle going anywhere except the Korean tree
The post is specifying the F-4E and A-4E. Not F-4s in general.
Of course South Korea used Ds and Es.
I used F-4E and A-4E as EXAMPLES.
This can be taken further ( which was the intent of my question) to all other planes with these issues. And boy there are plenty of those
Two more for you, combined eastern europe tech tree, & yugoslav tech tree. I do support both but I know many people hate the idea of either.
Got to focus more on what can be added to present tech tree’s that would be controversial
1 Like
if we go off of what the supposed Suggestion Mod said, it wouldn’t be Japan, Russia or US,
Gszabi said “vehicles” so likely a subtree of sorts
So, Turkey or any Arab country to Israel, Algeria to France
Germany just got a subtree so its unlikely, UK Ground just got moved around so maybe something controversial to the UK?
-ASEAN going to China could be a big one (or just Singapore)
-Iran going to China? They have gotten closer in terms of military within the last decade or so
1 Like
What for the UK though??? I need ideas to help fill this in by the way guys
2 Likes
literally any Ex-Colony to the UK
Nigeria to the UK? I mean, that’d bring them a lot of Soviet vehicles (T-72, T-55, BMP-1, BTR-60/70, ZSU-23-4, ) along with Chinese vehicles (ST-1, ZSD-85, VT-4)
Not to mention Fr*nch vehicles (AML-90, ERC)
Anything Russian through India? Not like something obscure but something clearly like an Su-30 or MiG-29.
Maybe? I don’t see it bringing a massive controversy as we already have T-90S and MiG-21 Bison in game, it would be sort of expected
1 Like
also i’d put Algeria to France back on there
And considering what I’ve seen in the community recently, people wouldn’t mind the Taiwanese M1A2T going to China
2 Likes
thats the exact thing I’m thinking about, what would cause a large enough controversy?
I don’t think there’s enough for a bingo card. These are few and obvious enough that Gaijin should have it easy to avoid them.
3 Likes
Algeria to France would do just that. I mean we’re talking T-90S, T-72M1, T-62, T-55AMV, BMP-2(M), BMPT-72, Fuchs 2*, BTR-80, PLZ-45, 2S1, 2S3, Pantsir, ZSU-23-4, MiG-29, Su-24, Su-30/35, Mi-8/-24/26/28 all to a NATO nation- not to mention that France and Algeria don’t exactly have positive ties.
*Already NATO but its a German vehicle going to France cause why the frick not?
^^not to mention the majority of these can just be copy and pasted from various (mainly the Soviet) trees
2 Likes
I still find it funny you only have “Canada to Germany” controversial, when “Canada to US” is equally as bad.
Take a look all all the “Canadian sub-tree to US” and all the Canadian’s deeply against it. Or literally everything to do with the fake US Skink
(I know this time the US and Japan are written off by the other comments)
3 Likes
thats something new to know then
(was in the middle of replying about this lol)
is it known if gaijin has officially recognized romania for italy?