there thinking about that its not confirmed and it seems pretty unlikely
Can’t wait for him to look at that “every Indonesian vehicle” overview from the subtree suggestion and hype it up as a new tree for the clickbait value, while getting the most basic details about just about every vehicle wrong…
Isnt it a new nation? Isnt this the first Indonesian vehicle in the game?
The term he could be using is this “War Thunder : New Indonesian sub nation to Japan (Sneak peak on what MIGHT come)” that what he should be using
That’s the thing, it technically is. But he knows wording it this way gets more views so it’s what he calls the video that is really just about blankly reading the recently passed ground subtree suggestion.
That being said it’s a great suggestion, so I hope if anything that leads more people to read it.
For anyone wondering, here’s the suggestion
And here’s a table of contents from the TEC video about the “FULL Tech Tree Previw” (literally part of the suggestion)
If we're lucky maybe he read far enough to find the latest version
Indonesian Sub-tree: Bhinneka Tunggal Ika! - #246 by NFrost51
They’d properly knew Thailand ground wasn’t enough which isn’t not but their air is great. Just a shame how gaijin seems to be flip flopping between China and Japan
I don’t think they are, I think they just realized they needed to fix issues with the Chinese tree, but since they didn’t want to do that attempted to divert existing resources there instead. It’s not so much that they were uncertain, just lazy.
Yeah i looked through it earlier, quite some interesting vehicles there.
So it is mainly the way youtube have been run for the last 10 years that is the problem, with the clickbaity thumbnails and titles?
I dont watch most of his videos, but i appreciate that he presents news and changes in the game for people that might not be on the forums and the subreddit. He also posts good videos from the dev servers, highlighting most of the new additions. So if i am unable to get on the dev server myself and i am interested in a particular vehicle, i look at his videos.
In this case yes, the actual video isn’t public so there isn’t any other known issues.
Yeah by itself it’s not an issue, he just sometimes distorts and skips information and lets personal bias creep in a bit much. Wouldn’t be an issue if he presented it that way, but he sells it as a news source which in some cases is problematic.
Not an issue as long as it’s taken with a grain of salt though.
That sucks so much. Can’t do anything anymore
Some messing with foilage and a few other settings more seems to have helped with the performance issues some but i still have the issue of the trees duplicating and often times not disappearing like they should.
Yeah but it would be nice to have more diversity, not especially stronger vehicles. The ouragan is amazing, don’t get me wrong, but I would enjoy something new.
And let’s be real the mistral would be hilarious
Well we can’t watch it yet, hopefully he just meant all the Indonesian vehicles we could get
once i have killed 1 teamate’s plane with my sturmorser’s shell lol
To be honest if he does mean that, I hope the 20 minute video means he’ll give some greater emphasis on the unique Indonesian vehicles (Harimau, Badak, etc.), unque Indonesian modifications (AMX-13 Retrofit, PT-76M, etc.) and maybe some more unusual imports like the BTR-4.
I just don’t want this video to end up telling everyone Indonesia is a boring subtree choice when it can easily become as interesting as South Africa was.
it would still have less range than buk m3 while having the same missile count. but it can also use ir missiles ig. samp/t is better than nasams in every way.
My bet is 20 minutes of waffling about the Leopard 2 and Apache with some “eh well c’est la vie” sprinkled in to boost the video length. The unique stuff comes in the second and third video which will come out a week and a month later respectively.
PAC-3 CRI then ig. Do you know how many PAC-3 MSE the new launcher can carry?