more wood to the fire thats what is going to bring that.
I heard about auto loader buffs for chn/ru .
Someone explain it to me alkhalid and vt-4 both have SSAL(solid state autoloader ) as per the pakistani manufacturer and licenced producer HIT , so shouldnt they be a little faster at reloading than older T-80s AND T-72s ?
According to the diagrams I looked at, they’re absolutely identical. The only changes are in the Shinano and No. 111.
More than all other nations combined lmao
truly balanced
1 Like
at least the only real differences between the three are the AA batteries, which arent all that relevant in my experience anyway
if anybody that is having issues with the ship’s in the leek list :
Project 48 Destroyer Leader type , Erevan (some time's called Yerevan)
Project 48 Destroyer Leader, Kiev - Lost Leader
https://war-book.ru/lidery-eskadrennyh-minonostsev-proekta-48/
Luigi Cadorna already was in the BP devblog
escorteur de Classe Élan "Commandant Dominé (A15 =} U70 =} F742)"
* COMMANDANT DOMINÉ (1940/1960)
Élan-class sloop - Wikipedia
Richelieu class , Jean Bart (1940 fit , pic 1/2/3 , or 1953 to end of life refit , pic 4/5/6 , not specified)
1940 fit
1953 to end of life refit
Crew
911 men in 1950 (incomplete)
1,280 during the Suez operations
2,220 planned in wartime
Technical characteristics
Length : 248 m
Beam : 35,5 m
Draft : 9,60 m
Displacement : 42 806 t
46 500 t (normal)
48,950 t (full load)
Propulsion : 6 Sural boilers
4 Parsons turbines - 4 propellers
Power : 155 000 ch
Speed : 32 knots (59 km/h)
Military characteristics
Armor ; Belt: 330 mm
Upper armored deck: 150 mm
Lower armored deck: 40 mm
Turrets: 430 mm
log cabin: 340 mm
Armament
2 quadruple 380 mm turrets forward
3 triple 152 mm turrets aft
In 1949
8 single 40 mm mounts Bofors Mk 1/2 AA
20 single 20 mm Oerlikon Mk 4 AA mounts
In 1953
12 twin 100 mm AA turrets
14 twin 57mm AA turrets licensed by Bofors
Electronics
electromagnetic detection means
Range
7,671 miles at 20 knots 3,181 miles at 30 knots
Le Brestois , 3 option's
- Adroit-class destroyer “Le Brestois” (1928/1942) (Pennant number: 12, 97, 14, 31, 51, T51)
* BRESTOIS (1928/1942)
French destroyer Brestois - Wikiwand
- Escorteur rapide type E50 “Le Brestois (F762)” , pre-retrofit
Escorteur rapide Le Brestois — Wiki-Brest
Caractéristiques
- Escorteur rapide type E50 “Le Brestois (F762)” , post-retrofit
same link has above for info
JESUS THAT TOOK WAY TO LONG AHAH
20 Likes
I expect trailer Thursday and dev server Friday
Ad populum fallacy.
Popularity doesn’t indicate anything other than personal preference.
Kh-59ME will be significantly worse than FAB-3000, GROMs, and Kh-38s for ground RB.
Kh-59ME is even worse than Kh-29 which itself is chronically bad for anything higher than 10.7 GRB.
4 - 6km lock range against targets is not good.
I mean some of these could still happen, the leak list usually doesn’t cover the entire update.
However I also wouldn’t have too high expectations for these “suprise vehicles”, as we don’t know if and what they are.
1 Like
yea truly balanced and later we got told that they are in doubt of adding an IR missile that just 2 nations could have the nations in question (israel and japan)
Clearly those 2 nations are oppressive in game…
…the lack of sound their remarkable absence make, quite a horror movie scene if you ask me.
Spoiler
Sorry i’m on team sarcasm tonight
The EBRC Jaguar effect i guess
2 Likes
yea yea ad populum fallacy sure alvis, MI-28NMs and Flankers slinging LMURs and KH-38s + russian W button enjoyers + spawn camping wiping entire nato teams from the map its ad populum fallacy. tell us another joke maybe we can laugh better at you and not with you.
surely japan and israel would be stronger than the major ones just for having a single strong close range missile right?
Spoiler
1 Like
hahahaha ahhgg man sometimes i think that the devs likes to troll us in every possible way in existence.
Its been a while when i picked this up.
Google KI and some other Internet Posts also says that apparently some sources claim that the musashi had some weaker armored parts then yamato but what is true in the end i cant tell.
is it possible to DM me these diagrams?
i would like to take a look at them too.
@ComodoroRinke
LMUR, AGM-179, and CM-502KG are strong AGMs because helicopters over-perform in radar and IR signatures.
I however have not died to a single Kh-38 when SPAA was up, the singular Kh-38 I’ve died to this year zero of my team mates were in SPAA, and I had France, Italy, and USA on my team, all tech trees with SPAA capable of dealing with Su-30 and Su-34.
My Abrams pens 10% more, reloads faster, is more mobile, has strong turret armor, and has protected ammo storage.
Mi-28NM is the first OP thing Soviets got at the same time as NATO in ever. It’s bad of course, but people didn’t anticipate these new AGMs on helicopters being OP.
Kh-38MT came 2 years after my CAS has been unkillable, and after Kh-38MT was added THEN we got SPAA that can deal with OP CAS.
Funny how they only added SPAA once the Soviets got something OP, but not when my nations had free reign of the skies for over 2 years prior to their announcement, and 3 years prior to the SPAA being added.
use your brain, the seeker doesnt matter when you have tons of explosvie and fly mach 2
1 Like
i just played 2 games of top tier (which i regret heavily) all 2 games we got pounded by lmurs, kh-38’s and hammers. Not fun in the slightest. How do you justify unfun things in a game. Cas should have no place in ground RB. Please remove it. Not fun. I spawn in my two AA’s (ito and elde 98) I live for 20 seconds with spawn protection, launch my only 4 trash iris-t’s which all miss because they can be 1 flared and i die. Stop justifying CAS, its cancer. Not a skill issue to die to it. Even the iris-t and samp/t on my team got overwhelmed and destroyed.
1 Like
Hey, do you know why some jet attackers get stock bomb loadouts, while others dont? Wouldnt this be a good thing for all the jet attackers to have?
3 Likes