Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion

Only naval for me. None of the game breaking bug reports were even looked at and no new aircraft to grind. Let alone the terrible state of ASB at hte moment with another update that added 0 new maps

Ok seriously the kill stat card is really getting me annoyed because I don’t need to know what killed me if I already have the kill feed in the bottom right corner and the kill cam

1 Like

There is so much random UI fluff been added in this major update and none of it is useful. It is time for a total UI overhaul and the ability to actually set up the UI like you want. Biggest pet peeve of mine is that any game bar small team indie games dont have even basic UI configuration options.

8 Likes

shame I hate the naval grind lol, looks like ill not be touching warthunder for a few weeks if not months

Yeah like nothing was wrong with the previous set up but like why do I need that extra UI when I already know the info that it’s telling me. It doesn’t even make sense in air at all.

1 Like

Yeah. I did try a thread to bring some attention to it and with everything enabled. The UI even starts to overlap. Its maddening

Thank god that bottom bar is totally unneeded and can be totally hidden

6 Likes

Not like the SPAA that Italy, France and GB would be able to counter the Rafale/Su-30SM lol.

The reason why Germany is having the flavor of the month effect is precisely because all the other new aa are so shit, GB, Italy and France wouldn’t be an exception.

1 Like

I would take any of the new SPAA over the ADATS any day of the week

1 Like

Gawd the Badger is well Bad. If I had to discribe it in one word: slow. Slow firerate, slow gun handling, slow movement. The 4th crew member is nice though. (Advice for anyone trying to stock grind it, don’t uptier it to the 9.3 line up, stay at 9.0. The stock APDS can do nothing to a T-series with ERA, so 10.3 uptiers are a slog, + The limited amount of 10.0s means you tend to get 8.7-9.7 games, which are fairly manageable if you keep an eye out for T-64Bs. An Example 9.0 line up: Badger, Chieftain Mk.10, Buccaneer S1 or Scimitar F Mk.1, Fox/Scimitar, ZA-35, Chieftain Marksman.)

Hopefully we get the ATGM carrier variant next update, which should be fairly fun.

Nah. Otomatic and ADATS are too OP.

After the Fox being too good. They arent risking it again

It’s an afternoon grinding in the Cent Mk.5/1 I’ll never get back lmao.

I knew the moment it was annoucned it was going to be poor and probably wasnt going to even look at it. Now. Definetly not

I had some hope when I saw the BR, I’m quite a fan of the CTCWs in the Japanese tree @ 9.7 which are a very similar configuration (1x30mm gun etc etc) but ooooh boi I wish they’d have just gone for the ATGM carrier version (Its the one I wanted more anyway)

welp the one addition to the UK that i kinda looked forward to glad we got another IFV that is useless, could have been one of multiple CTA40 IFVs that would have been somewhat good but here we are I guess, gonna be honest I cant tell if getting terrible tanks like the badger is better then just getting nothing at least then you aren’t getting disappointment after several hours to days of grinding

3 Likes

Gaijin is so clever, guys. Instead of needing to research 6 ships to progress to rank 7 naval for some nations, they simply moved one of those ships to rank 5 instead.
Nothing changes because you still need to research every single ship in the tree to get to the one and only rank 7.
Anyway, anyone have the F-2 yet? Still good or did it get shadownerfed when the update came out?

witnessed J11 tank 15 missiles. Very funny lol

1 Like

Yeah I heard missiles are buggy as hell rn

1 Like

that is an understatement

3 Likes

well I was hoping for a Premium Coastal ship an Type-22 Frigate for the GB tech tree in the Coastal Waters.

Since the Falklands map has been added I was expecting to see modern naval ships of the late Cold War.

Perhaps next time?

3 Likes