As far as “suffering” goes i would argue the British tree is fairly well off and there are much worse off nations currently.
Spoiler
I could make an incredibly hot take and argue that Russia despite the KH-38 spam and Pantsir is in a far worse state across the board than the British are going by statistics alone but that would be going to far and i am liable to get my head ripped off by certain people. ;p
The thing is that if someone limits themselfs to one nation than imo that person doesn’t get to complain 879856798476x per week about X nation suffering.
Like every nation has good and bad BRs, it’s just how the game works at this point.
I keep seeing minor nation mains say this, but among forum users it doesn’t seem representative
US mains being bad at the game, shouldnt be a reason to artificially nerf minor nations. They have some os the strongest vehicles at their respective BRs but still ahve terrible win rates.
Winrates are worthless for comparing nations anyway. Minor nations could be on the US team and lose and then be on the German/soviet team and win and end up with a 50% winrate where the US loses both matches. Even if the Minor nation sat in spawn and didnt move the entire game. Doesnt mean the minor nation is better than the US team
I’ve given up with ground at this point and the RP gains need to be icnreased by a factor of 10 before I ever consider grinding another nation.
But if the default answer is “just dont play that BR” that isnt that a clear indicator that something is wrong? If they are that weak that the reocmmendation is to simply not play them, then shouldnt they at least be at a lower BR?
I have beaten F-20 premiums, In a gunfight, with the Tonka GR4. It doesnt mean the GR4 is a better gunfighter than the F-20.
Its basic common sense. Look at nations with identical vehicle. like say the Typhoons. Unless you are telling me that the LWR on the Typhoon FGR4 is the reason why Britain has a 10% higher winrate than the German and Italian Typhoon, something else must clearly be going on here