This wouldn’t even be political , Czechoslovakia can easily hold its own in all main branches barring naval (which Israel showed wouldn’t matter). Poland and Ukraine both cooperated extensively with with Czechoslovakia and/or with its successor states and would provide bonus options as well.
2 Likes
what about matchmaking
As far as i see there should be some delimitation and at least the US and USSR trees should only have NATO and Warsaw vehicles respectively, not mixed and matched.
At least in those 2 nations, Britain and Germany already have a mix of both because of India/GDR, and i think instead of adding a mixed NATO/WARSAW subtree to USSR they make it it’s own thing.
3 Likes
Indeed, not just them, there are a good few nations with plenty to add.
But instead people want them as ST with <10% of anything they used, in a nation that doesn’t need them, to it’s wrong for them there, just because they want one C&P that could have had something from the host tree instead.
3 Likes
I hope skyranger this patch
2 Likes
Would be nice to see
Brotha we just got SLM, we ain’t getting a new spaa till next year…
And sadly it would be middy unless it’s like 11.0-11.3 and that’s if it gets FAPDS, if not it’s a Gepard 1A2 sidegrade.
you mean like, having nations foldered into bigger nations? where you just have a tab with a nations vehicles inside?
theyd get clumped in under the bigger nation’s matchmaking so the matchmaker doesnt get clogged up, and they could get their own research still (and maybe have it like the heli research where you can use the main tree to grind its “sub” tree)
this would allow for the full set of vehicles to be added, doesnt clog up the host tree or the matchmaker, they can be played together to fill gaps, and the host could research the sub so you could say, use the premiums you may or may not already have
1 Like
Well, i can understand, but this could be more interesting then iris-t for me.
Seems the only thing they really worry about is the tree receiving western equipment, such a weird thing to be worried about. It’s bound to happen anyway.
1 Like
Maybe but when russia blows up your amunition depot and kils several people in its proces it kinda doesnt sit right
5 Likes
Nah, i’m saying to just make a new Yugo/Checz/Poland/Whatever tree that would include both NATO and Warsaw vehicles instead of adding NATO vehicles to USSR or god forbid something like Serbia to US that would add Warsaw vehicles to NATO.
With the matchmaker and stuff gaijin could make them attached to certain nations at certain BR’s, let’s say at cold war it’s Warsaw attached and in modern it’s NATO attached, there’s way too many vehicles to make a subtree only anyway anyway.
The attached research and being able to research with another nations premium seems good but it won’t ever happen.
5 Likes
“I don’t want an 180+ vehicle strong tree to be reduced to event or premium fodder for one the largest ingame trees”
“Must be the western vehicles”
And yes I think the Indian subtree was one of the worst ideas in a long while
4 Likes
I don’t think it’ll be Czechoslovakia but ok
Just add the post soviet states like Ukraine, Belaruss etc
1 Like
fug it just split it.
Poland (warsaw)
Poland (NATO)
cram those in whatever tree you like as a research tab, mixing problem solved
You see that would actually be controversial to a large portion of the community given certain current events.
Czech ST would only tilt purists, the 5-6 independent TT people on the forums and people who get way to emotionally invested in certain stuff that really doesn’t matter because at the end of the day since its a game…
I should also clarify something I really could care less if they added a Czech subtree or not. Its a wholly boring tree conceptually (both independent and subtree) and I would rather them focus on adding more domestic ussr stuff than whatever slop the Czech tree would add…
1 Like
Those should already be in USSR technology tree, I think.
1 Like
people are about to get mad at you lmao
That’s what I meant
1 Like