Nothing of the Montana was made. It was a model only. The A-150 qualifies as a unfinished proto due to unique parts being made specifically for it. If something was made and got used for something else, then I dont think it counts to the unique stuff, but I aint sure
1 Like
I’m pretty sure your right, I remember seeing this point used when someone was attempting to suggest the IJN Zipang.
All the more reason to add it
I am fiending for more MiG content
3 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
7 Likes
I hadn’t seen my fan in while tbh, props because he’s not posted since October last year : P
1 Like
We could get the F/A-18E block 1 foldered with the C late since it gets the same avionics, just more payload at the cost of flight performance
Block 2 or 3 would be superior though since it gets better avionics and armament
the thing is the F-18 is already subpar in that regard and i dont think that more missiles will help there
1 Like
Exxxxxxcept… if it’s classed as a strike aircraft. And imo that can very much work, hornets were always meant as fighters AND attackers
thing is that we have platforms that can do both jobs better
the F-15E is a far better striker and also far more capable in missile combat
Well if you follow that logic they may as well not add the superhornets at all
That is only going to hurt it more. The upside that the current Hornet has in game is that it’s classed as a fighter, meaning you can take it together with the F-15E in GRB.
Who in their right mind would take a super hornet into GRB over the F-15E.
And that is a bad thing how?
Wait you can’t take two strikers in ground battles? I didn’t know that
1 Like
You can, but as soon as you spawn the first strike fighter the second one will be 1500-2000 SP at top tier.
Meanwhile fighters and attackers have different SP pools, so spawning a fighter won’t increase the spawn cost of the attacker afterwards(and the other way around).
1 Like
Oh that makes sense
1 Like
So does this mean the A-150 could be added to the game? i thought the minimum was for them to be laid down.
Workhorse of US Navy? They can just add a block 2 at 14.0, it’s a worse F-2 with more missiles basically
3 Likes
Yeah that’s fake. Not from any of the trusted sources of leaks.
Also the US would get the F-16C PoBIT not the V since the F-16V is just for export. Both however would be the same since the PoBIT upgrades are to bring block 40/42’s and 50/52’s to the block 70 standard.
4 Likes
People really getting unimaginative with their fakes
2 Likes
Yes