Rafale f4.1 will change nothing for air compared to f3.r only starting f4.2 and .3 that there will be meaningful change for the game.
Do you have an updated proposed Yugo TT?
Because their Air TT on the forums is just mostly C&P with some unique things. Its mostly different names, E.G. China with the J-2, J-7 etc…
Ground does have some nice things to offer. But mostly at top tier.
Their naval is also VERY lackluster.
I would see them as a sub-TT for Poland-Eastern Europe TT at best… I do hope for you that it will become independend, but i dont think that will happen.
BeNeLux, ASEAN, LATAM and Korea TT are waaay better options IMHO. Especially if i look on the suggestion that has been made on the TT.
Isn’t LATAM’s only top tier vehicle the Centauro for ground?
1 Like
Yeah, and a Modified 2A4.
But everything else is decent loaded of content.
1 Like
The one from Chile? On their tech tree its only 11.3.
Does have some interesting content but I believe Eastern Europe does have more to offer
1 Like
Their sub-tree got done really dirty, same with all the other ones
7 Likes
First, sadly not. Afaik that proposal is in hiatus.
Second, that’s rich. VERY. It’s got as much unique stuff as Poland, probably more in terms of attackers/ armed trainers. Let’s be real though, the CZSK folks were the real innovators.
Absolutely untrue. They’ve unique stuff spanning all the way. Again, the proposals don’t tell the true picture.
Noone cares about naval btw. Poland didn’t have any BBs themselves either.
I still cannot agree with that. Yugoslavia liberated itself, had a neutral relationship with east / west during the cold war, even led and brought up a neutral union of countries.
And one thing, we’re definitely NOT eastern europeans.
Those are all mighty fine suggestions yes, which I fully support.
I am talking about a one nation ( yuga was close enough but not quite), full fledged tree across all BRs.
And while I may be very patriotic, I do believe not having Yuga as a standalone tree is a great mistake.
Though, I do see PL+CZSK being a huge thing as well, let’s not do that one dirty. Just keep Yugo away from it
4 Likes
Yeah they were the lucky ones, after we revealed the TS-16 Grot everything went downhill.
3 Likes
Well, i hope for you.
But seeing Benelux as a sub-TT makes me doubt it.
Especially since they have a Huge navy and lots of modern equipment for the future; like stealth, submarines, attack drones, scouting and WWI.
3 Likes
Make her steady Cap’in, we don’t wanna ruin the Cornish coast now do we.
If you do make sure to hit Dawlish
I do
(Regardless I would love to see all the Yugoslavia vehicles, including the naval forces. Besides Israel has at most 3 options for Bluewater (unless there were major refits) so that precedent is set).
9 Likes
I did too…
Until Soyuz. That thing immediately killed my interest for Naval.
Imagine finally getting to play with real, legendary, veteran ships that sailed the seas and fought… only to be clowned by some impossibly optimistic iteration of a project that could have never been completed as specified by the designs on paper for technical and industrial limitations.
If Soyuz was at least on par with Iowa and Yamato, it would be fine… but it’s just on a whole different league. It’s not even on the same sport. It’s ridiculous.
EDIT: NOT this post being flag-spammed for being “abusive and offensive” LMFAO
7 Likes
Please tell me that work was made on a prototype, I don’t want to feel the same disappointment as I did with the Skorpion
Well the tables may turn as that means the Lion, H-39 and A-150 can all join.
Also the joys and whimsy playing arcade coastal (granted you can find a game in under 4 minutes, I somehow managed to get a ton of coastal games today).
1 Like
H-39 is just a Bismarck with marginally better firepower, and A-150 was never laid down, so it’s not eligible for ingame implementation (just like Montana).
Lion could be neat, though!
True, but one it’s guns were made so it’s apparently eligible.
2 Likes
what next, a bucket of paint for the Montana was made?
1 Like
also the hull.
Don’t argue with me, talk with the suggestion moderators, already tried to check if the Montana was eligible but they said no parts specific to it was made.
they made the improved 5" guns for the Montanas, but they got repurposed for the Midways after Montana was cancelled
but it isnt certain whether those used on Midway were originally made for Montana, or it they were made for Midway, since the planned mount for the Montana was twin mounts like the 5/38 on Iowa but the ones on Midway are single gun
1 Like