mig-35 was never used by india though. it’s russian only. it lost in indian trials to the rafale
And that Rafale will be in Britain when it comes : )
You just said Rafale lmao
What? I was talking about mig-35, i just said it lost to rafale in a competition. i dont care about rafale, it should go to both japan and britain eventually anyways
1 Like
And this is the rumour thread and not the wish listing thread so bye bye of you go
2 Likes
alright thanks mate
1 Like
Piranha II LCTS is a weird choice, would probably be 8.7 or so given the 90mm main gun and manual loader. I would honestly expect it to be a event vehicle too, considering it’s a British export using foreign parts.
I’d also think Gaijin is smart enough to add the Piranha IIIC DF90 first, as the Piranha II LCTS is basically just an earlier version of it, and the IIIC DF90 actually saw service.
Nothing really, British doctrine is to use Frigates and destroyers with Aster 30, and Typhoons + F-35 in an interception role
1 Like
Too many vehicles that I’m interested in on that list, which means it’s definitely fake.
Also, AH-64E us a weird choice, as you basically get nothing new, the UK isn’t buying brimstones for them, going with the dolled up hellfire that is JAGM, a (in wt) SAL atgm with 8km of range. Oh and loosing the Starstreaks.
Oh, and the Type-10 APS is various levels of paper, as they’re still in the selection phase of picking an APS for integration iirc.
1 Like
They added the F-15A with the Su-27.
They added the F-15C MSIP II with the Su-27SM.
They added the F-15E with the Su-34.
There’s no way they will add the Su-35S without the F-15EX
That’s not how things work.
However, that list is fake cause CATTB is on it, and AH-64E is singular.
CATTB would likely come with Object 195, 130mm Leopards, and 140mm Leclercs.
Translation for everyone
Obviously this confirms nothing but “anything is possible”, nothing more, nothing less.
3 Likes
F15EX is not a Su35S equivalent. F15E should have been a worse F15C, except for some reason it got 229, which pumped it up to a height it shouldn’t be, otherwise an AESA F15 should be Su35 equivlaent.
Meh, fair I guess. But would a F-15C with AESA be superior to the F-15E though?
@Smin1080p_WT Would you like to comment as to not turn this into a roller coaster of “You promised news today, where my blog” ?
Well with new AMRAAMs it could be just as good. I mean Su35 can’t be as fast as F15E anyway, so I don’t necessarily see why it couldn’t be better, since if modelled properly AMRAAMC should be faster than R-77-1, and then it will be sort of like a balanced meta where F15s are better for BVR, and flankers continues to be better in other aspects. Although I know with current seeker heads it’s hard to think that BVR can be that much more useful, but anyhow this is the way we have to go down. Another option is dropping the F15E without 229 engines and getting a 229 engine version with better missiles, which will be even better BVR but sucks more WVR.
Su-35S will have R-37M with range greater than SB maps.