ive also never seen one of these things even fire
And then we dont know what changes theyve done by 2010 so again without documentation we dont know if its better or worse via personal modifications.
well only reason id assume it took so long as they had to reverse engineer the missile from just a there left over parts
You know linking me the wiki means essentially nothing as its not a credible source
its honestly probably what warthunde went off when they made the Fakour 90
As funny as it is for that to be true id believe it when it comes to gaijins history videos considering their video of Finnish tank history is so poorly researched i found most of their claims are just personal bias they added or genuine lack of care.
But i know theres a plethora of other videos that have about the same level of misinformation thrown in
1 Like
They do not.
1 Like
The truth is the Fakour-90 is made up of guesswork and Iranian Media. Gaijin for some reason thinks it’s an ARH Hawk missile when it’s clearly a copied Aim-54A with the HAWK booster. It should have the same G pull as the Phoenix. They did this to justify putting an F-14A platform at 13.0.
1 Like
what makes it pull 20 g tho ? instead of 17G ? its heavier than og A model butt lighter than C model and has a model fins i dont think the hawk motor would do that as its not thrust vectoring math doesnt add up and from what i can find A model AIM54 doesnt use duel plane
Eh if that were the case i feel they wouldn’t have let it sit under BR’d for months on end, regardless its more so a sidegrade to the F14B with how the Fakour’s perform
They think it’s the Hawk missile, so when the bugreport went through, they buffed the Fakour too.
It was underBR’d for like 1-2 months before it was raised to 12.7 if iI remember correctly. Months on end is a bit of an exaggeration.
I’d rather them remove the R-27R and Fakour and place it at 12.3 where it belongs. Aim-9Ps at 13.0 with upgraded bomber missiles is not it.
Honestly i still find it to be effective at 13.0 i just wish Sedjeels were a bit faster but whatever, i rarely use them but i think its fine at 13.0 my KD isnt crazy but i think i have like a 2.0 not that KD really matters, there are far better pilots than me. Only thing id take from the F14B is the engines Honestly.
The most important thing is the RWR and engines.
Is there any latest news on the armor issue report of the Mecawa MK4 from a few years ago?
You are getting 0% more RP, how much more do you want? :P
1 Like
Aim7f does but it’s easy to dodge and sometimes dosent work also it’s only sarh and the f14 radar being easy to notch in game as well. the fact the r27r has 35g at Mach 3.5 witch is good and it also has the r27er witch is the best fox 1 in game 35g at Mach 5.8 and both the missile use sarh,iog,dl also on paper the mig29 flight characteristics is better (at least the one in game fact sheet)then the f14A not to mention its acceleration time witch i have both f14A models and when I fly them the mig29 accelerates faster until the f14 reach Mach 0.80-1.10 the f14 starts to reel in a lil a stay on the 6 or sometimes even catch up if mig29 turns or just fly bad
I’d rather keep the Fakour missile and the r27r were it’s at honestly I find it balanced where it’s at because it’s not all games the fakour missile does good and the r27r come in clutch to help with 2 kills and the 9p honestly doesn’t competently suck
Just tell me that you never flown the mig29
We all should k ow at this point that the statcards can’t be trusted
Just like the microwave the Mig29 radar is