My post stands still. At 10.3 the Su-15TM can be perfectly limited to R60s
and i dont see why they wouldn’t let the export su-35 carry r-37ms between the intakes/on the engines like domestic su-35s
if only they’d always use BR to balance things and left armarment realistic… id have a Phantom with 9F at 9.7
thatll make it even worse than Yak38…
and thats not a particularly good aircraft either
you fly jets?
Check the forwarded suggestion. It would be a less capable MiG-23 but still work at 10.3 (Without R60Ms)
im not saying its not compatible, but i mean it has some physical differences in antennas mainly, also the best weve seen is it only carries 4x missiles
no… I maintain them
Yeah people seem to be forgetting that Gunslinger is an SM-6 sans booster stuck to a plane. Even if the plane its attached to is a slug its not really going to suffer much.
Both Krug and S-200 are some of my favorite SAMs visually for the launch alone.
F-35A has its own gun and the outer pylons only take AIM-9M
There is also the gunpod for the other F-35’s
The Su-15TM does carry R-60Ms though, unless you mean it shouldn’t get them.
Who here has put in a vacation day for this coming Friday since we know dev server will happen that day?
Vacation day for war thunder? Absolutely not, how will I buy half of the new content in the next update?
Don’t need to if you don’t work fridays :p
I expect nothing short of such an answer from Gaijin’s most favorite slave.
Lucky you.
Exactly this. The SM-6 is supposed to be able to go from a VLS tube to a target upwards of 250nmi away (potentially more but, ehhhhh). I think it’ll do just fine being launched from an airplane going ~600 knots at 10k+ feet.
Its got a pretty big booster section on VLS version that isn’t on AIM-174. So I wouldn’t expect it to exceed 250nmi by much unless proven otherwise
Which one will be better for Air RB?
- Gripen E
- J-10C