you should have gone for upgraded phantoms as well
2 Likes
In that case. Britain recieved the ASRAAM in 1998. US didnt get Aim-9X block 1 till 2003 and then didnt get Block 2 until after 2008 sometime.
So We should have Typhoon with ASRAAM vs F-15E with Aim-9M because thats what the year of introduction means.
peak would love the YF4E or something
1 Like
they still act as decent indicators of tech/capability when you compare 2 aircraft of same class (air superiority/multirole in this case)
AIM-9M10 is on par with early Aim-9X
1 Like
right picture is a F-5 and bottom left is a Phantom
1 Like
well then the F-15E would just be a lower BR bc its older?
and still a fraction of the performance of ASRAAM. Even Block II is weaker than ASRAAM
no HOBS
a little worse but not by much
thats the whole argument
it dosent matter when something entered service
Why?
You are proposing F-22 to fight Typhoon and therefore probably the same BR, because it was introduced first and that the US needed the F-15C to fight the Sea Harrier FA2 and Tornado F3 Late because it was introduced first.
So I vote we add ASRAAM first because it was introduced first
1 Like
There is always something to argue about.
hold up does that mean F14A should be 10.3 fighting MIG-21 early models ?
Because he only plays America
1 Like
because its older, so in this hypothetical it would be a lower BR
german mg151 being worse cannons in game
no iam saying that the BR and the date something entered service have nothing to do with each other
otherwise me262 would sit at 6.0 or something like that
The only aircraft I have at 13.7 or above rn is the M2K and the Rafale. And right now the only 120 slinger I’m remotely close to is the Eurofighter, I’ll take mid over nothing. Rafale is fun as hell but being defensive until someone lets me get close gets tiring after a while.
Well, I am researching the F-15J…M… but playing a SARH slinger (F-15J) at 14.0 is going to drive me to drinking.
yeah im agreeing the F14A was in vietnam