Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion

This will end up like the lootboxes and only implemented for the countries in which this is required.

1 Like

Fleet defence

The fleet in question: A single carrier

There also currently is no top tier ARB map with carriers, that currently is only a thing in Sim and there you don’t have to worry about people attacking your fleet because it literally isn’t worth trying to attack ships.

For the kinds of encounters you have in WT giving the F-14 only Sparrows and Sidewinders would have been completely fine.

Actually I just remembered Israel did make their CH53s a launch platform for the nimrod missile. So we could get an armed CH53 just not for the US.

IMG_3030

1 Like

The “fleets” on most maps, if you can even call them that, usually are comprised of a carrier that does laps without any escorts way too close to the actual battlefield, some random ships going along a patrol path, some ships anchored in bay areas and maybe some cargo ships without any escorts.

A lot of the time there is no real fleet to speak of, with the carrier doing its laps at some random spot and a couple of anchored ships at the bays and in ARB only the lower tier maps feature ships for whatever reason.

They definitely could put carriers and ships on maps like Golan Heights, Southeastern City (or whatever that one is called) and Spain, but they just don’t. Similarly they could include a lot of the maps that feature ships and carriers in top tier, but they also don’t do that.

1 Like

If Gaijin would add proper gunners for helicopters we could still get on for the US, just armed with some .50 cals. Would be effectively useless but would still be cool to see.

The rocket on steroids with the turn radius of a small country?
Its gameplay would basically be: fly across the whole map in less than a minute, destroy some fighters on its way, fail to turn around, get kicked for crossing the border of the map

Well, for some reason people think that it and the MiG-25/31 would make for good additions to WT

At least the foxbat and foxhound do turn… The turn radius of a yf12 is LITERALLY 150 km
It is, without any exageration, completely unusable in a game like warthunder

at mach 3.2 maybe, if they step it down a bit i think it could be managable, i heard A-12 series was alright to fly or something

osprey cool, shame they never put any weapons on a Mi-26 (afaik)

Wdym? The aircraft was specifically made for the AIM-54 it was loading AIM-54s.

Also on your point of the AIM-54. That is what is kinda considered a requirement for an aircraft to be a 4th gen.

I believe I mixed the production dates for the Phoenix and Tomcat around. It was somehow stuck in my mind that the Tomcat entered production before the Phoenix did.

About the jet fighter generations, carrying ARHs is not a requirement for a fighter to be considered 4th gen, the 4th generation of fighter jets predates the introduction of the AIM-120, R-77 and MICA.

The F-15, F-16, F/A-18, MiG-29, Su-27, Tornado, Mirage 2000 and Saab 37 all entered service without ARHs and didn’t carry any for quite some time.

Fair enough. BVR was one of the staples for 4th gen fighters and I usually just associate that with the ARH. But the SARH of the other aircraft do still hit the BVR abilities.

Either way the F-14 was an Fox3 slinger when it entered and was the staple for it’s introduction.

They will come eventually. The top tier aircraft rush is almost over and I’m really happy about that, first because we’ll finally have the F-22 and the F-35s but also because once it’s over the F-106, F-102 and all of the other cool cold war aircrafts will be added, I have no doubt about that! Just have to be patient.

3 Likes

I think we will see them eventually. Right now, Gaijin is rushing towards the end of the Air tech tree, not unlike what they were doing with Ground a few years ago. Gaijin needs a constant stream of new content for the game, so they will double back once they “catch up” to the end of Air, which I think they’ll be close to doing by the end of this year.

With the potential introduction of strategic bombers drawing close, this would give a great opportunity to go back and add more of the dedicated interceptor aircraft that have been missed. But not unlike the strategic bombers, not every nation has their own interceptor designs, so this would mostly benefit the USA and USSR.

2 Likes

What is the best top tier 14.0?

  • Su-30SM
  • F/A-18C Late
  • Eurofighter
  • Rafale
  • F-15E
0 voters

With a mig-25 in the works it seems that gaijin may begin doing that sooner than we thought.

whats biggest size naval map

I don’t think they are gonna focus on older planes just yet. The MiG-25 will just be fanservice if it actually gets added, pretty much like the F-117.
I don’t know why they would go for the MiG-25 anyways, the MiG-31, while still not being ideal for WT in the slightest, would be a much more viable addition to the game, because that one at least has weapons that can keep it semi-competitive at the BR that is required to balance its raw speed.

Not sure how big the naval EC maps are, but I’d guess at least 64x64km