I don’t play air so I’m not too sure what that is exactly, and I can’t speak for how the balancing is for US air, but does the US actually need it, or is this something people want?
Valid point only thing I could see the benefit being for gaps in the SPAA tree which I am confident will show again.
wasnt aware SK had Abrams?
K1 is sort of based on it
Hispanic countries have the potential to create their own TT, I’d prefer that over us being scattered between 4 countries.
The US would benefit from the addition of an extra tank with some good armor for once additional and it will give some cool side grades and my big thing is keeping a lot of american designs in america. Also it’ll will make gaijin focus on the domestic tanks and jets for other nations instead of CP
1 Like
so its not an Abrams
The K1 is a refitted abrams
They already have most of their F-15’s and their subtree so idk
they want it they dont need it
3 Likes
Yeah pretty much
Yup. I would also love that, i was only saying the US since that’s what we have at the moment
1 Like
Not really it’s pretty different
That could easily be a SEPv3. But I guess it isn’t real.
thing is the things you want aren’t american designs, K1 K2 and K9 aren’t American they are SK
1 Like
India-Pakistani TechTree when?
K1 is GDLS/Chrysler though, working with SK companies, so it’s both
Smin said we aren’t at a point where region nations are being considered by the devs so god knows who will we get next
American company =/= american design I will once again point to KF41, CV90, Ajax
6 Likes
Think gaijin needs to fix the current list of nations before cutting any chance to fix what they have by sending a tt into another tree