Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion

I enjoy Naval more than ground and have been tempted to grind another naval tree, but I just cant bring myself to do it.

I haven’t played a single russian vehicle in nearly 6 months now

1 Like

Hahaha

And its gonna stay that way until an r class is added, originally i didn’t play anything russian designed in any tech tree but warspite made other trees ok but russian tree no

1 Like

yes, having your stuff added to other tree first is pretty infuriating. AV-8B+ all over again

1 Like

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

M4A3E2 Jumbo and M4/T26 are essentially the same tank. /s
They aren’t

@Morvran
Those Chieftains should be tech tree, as they fill holes.
Challenger 1 wouldn’t fill a hole, and it’s also far more difficult to research and would elongate the development time for a squadron vehicle, it also came after T-90S was chosen.

Then you have bad-faith arguments of “Gaijin doesn’t care about Britain cause they don’t have a squadron vehicle.” cause the Challenger Falcon takes an extra year over researching a vehicle that has plenty of English-language export documentation.

Stop implying Challenger 3 is copy-paste by calling unique vehicles what they aren’t.

Oh, and yes, 1 year is indeed faster than 3+ years which was the alternative.
I’m here stuck defending the British tech tree and Italian tech tree.

@Mitchverr
Hawk would’ve slowed down development for other vehicles, which could’ve caused one more major update without Typhoons.
Also your post calling SAAB liars is just sad.

1 Like

T-90a and t-90s actually are the same, a is a variant of the export s model of the t-90, a is literally the s adopted into russian army service

2 Likes

I knew I’ve made this for a reason

8 Likes

well i have time and the round will still have more exploive filler after the nerf than it should have

total explosive weight of the M380A1 is 18.69lb, including the propellant to fire it
image
and we also know that it uses the same propellant as the M329A1
image

with the M329A1 being a sabot it only has the propellant as an explosive, which ammounts to 17.5lb
image

image

18.69lb - 17.5 lb = 1.19lb
1.19lb = 0.54kg
so the round has more explosive filler after the nerf than it has IRL
image

Document used is able to be publicly used

1 Like

But seriously though Italy needs a squadron vehicle

and what vehicle would you like to give him?

This the MC 205V in REAF colors

ok ignore that
go Discussing the M830A1 nerf - #6 by Cloudzy26160 real quick

So they just used a website journal?

There are a lot of Italian vehicles to add (+Romanian and Hungarian), some can come as regular, some as premium, some as squadron.

Spoiler

Theoretical full Italian Ground Forces tech tree

My personal favorites are vehicles equipped with weapon systems which you can find in the TT, but on different chassis, like Centauro T60/70A and VBC PT.1.

1 Like

maybe
likely because 1. its in russian hence they can access it 2. they just want to nerf m830a1 3. some intern suggest it so gaijin “fixed” it
because there is no bug report on it, or anything really

Warspite is definitely without HE-VT. HE-VT put in battlefield service even in USN at 1942 December, and Warspite ingame is earlier than that.

knowing that there are still a lot of light/ifv vehicles not in the game i presume ther will be coming a lot of them coming and that woult make it more interesting.

For ground, MBTs/medium tanks generally tend to be more appearing to a more general and wide audience, so there being a lot of light vehicle options doesn’t mean that a lot are coming any time soon.

1 Like