This guy made a good explanation
1 Like
lets first get mig25 in the ussr tech tree bro :sob:
1 Like
Didn’t it get disproven? Here is another VF-111 jet
Well… I think Gaijin can better test the vehicle by adding it as an premium vehicle to Japan first.
Look how it plays through stats, and then add it to the Russian TT.
hell no
2 Likes
it was tested
apart from the 27ET you rarely use the IR at more than 4-5 km, and honestly, apart from the simulation the smokeless engine changes a lot of things
Japanese pilots going in and looking at a USN Tomcat isn’t the same as really testing it.
Can USA get Typhoon, since it was “tested” by USAF pilots?
1 Like
Well, can we also penalize every tank with manual load for loading on the move in that case?
1 Like
I choose this one, its very needed :)
But they could change the F16A OCU to its historical loadout (removing 120s so IR missiles only) wich would grand Japan a similiar Aircraft at 12.7 but with bedder Air to ground armament to remove the AJ.
1 Like
The responses in the KH-38 thread and all the threads complaining about the F-18A being at 12.3 as well as some other posts on the forum just reinforce my belief that most players don’t actually care about balance but are instead more concerned with their preferred nation/vehicle stomping everybody else for.
American and Russian mains are the worst for it honestly.
Hasn’t stopped Gaijin before.
1 Like
The whole thing about “i only play the strong ones” are whats ideal for gaijin, there is a division between national mains, and overcoming this hindsight requires a lot of grinding across trees
1 Like
Cough cough
In all honest tornado kinda suck so its more of a joke
1 Like
If there’s some video or documented proof of just how much it affects the reloading process, so we are not applying a blanket penality; sure. I’m not denying that it impacts it, but the question is by how much and what terrain do you levy it. The barrel movement is something autoloaders do and I’ve been told the barrel salute for manual tanks is just something that can help the loader but isnt required sometimes. But if we are going to implement the mechanic that raises the barrel when rotating the turret behind the tank, something that can be disabled on some tanks like the Leopard and Abrams, we should at least see the autoloader system impact the barrel traverse.
Datamined T-34-85 models with improved details, i thought they already done that for enlisted?
8 Likes
nation mains usually wants nerfs for the other side without similar mechanics for their own vehicles.
After everyone gets their turret baskets/vertical drives modeled I think the game will be in a pretty fair place. Both autoloaders and mechanical loaders have positives and negatives.
1 Like
DoOovBleG, when?
When?
WheN?
WHEN?
4 Likes
We’re like 1-2 weeks out from devblogs
1 Like